In article
<b92ddfea-948b-43f2-88f1-6d97e3183de9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Apr 3, 5:08=A0pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> forevernitefan =A0(Moe) <fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Moe > As for him being a burglar felon, I've explained
>> Moe > what would convince me of that claim. I will
>> Moe > not go to the courthouse for the alleged
>> Moe > records because it's not up to me to PROVE
>> Moe > your claims. The fact that not one of you
>> Moe > ( even Greg, who is closest to the courthouse
>> Moe > in question) has bothered to even see if these
>> Moe > files actually exist on the MONTHS you've
>> Moe > been hurling this accusation, well that tells
>> Moe > a lot about all of you. It suggests that you
>> Moe > boys know that the whole " convicted gagage
>> Moe > burgalry felon" crap is a straw man, and it's
>> Moe > too risky for any of you to go that last step
>> Moe > and find the court do***ents, because of
>> Moe > the distinct possibility that they don' t exist.
>>
>> tjab > The fact that you do not accept the full published
>> tjab > decision of the Supreme Court of Iowa denying
>> tjab > Kent's appeal of his felony burglary conviction as
>> tjab > proof that he is a convicted felon shows that you
>> tjab > are either incredibly ignorant of how the legal
>> tjab > system works or in the deepest denial anyone
>> tjab > anywhere has ever seen. Well, either that or you
>> tjab > are trolling, intentionally making yourself look
>> tjab > the fool in order to see if you can get a little
>> tjab > attention for yourself.
>>
>> Very well said.
>>
>> The deep denial reminds me of cult members.
>>
>> The "clown" aspect reminds me of Kent Wills' famous quotes.
>
>Well gag you certaily kow how the legal system works. After all,
>you've had many experiences and even some time being locked up to
>prove it.
>
> I've said what constitutes proof for me. If you and " legal expert"
>Tjab want to claim what you have is legal proof, feel free to submit
>such in a court of law. I am not in " denial"
If you do not accept the full published opinion of the Supreme Court
of Iowa denying Kent's appeal of his felony burglary conviction as
proof that Kent is a convicted felon, then you most assuredly are.
(And not about just that, I would guess.)
|
