"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:b92ddfea-948b-43f2-88f1-6d97e3183de9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 3, 5:08 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Very well said.
>>
>> The deep denial reminds me of cult members.
>>
>> The "clown" aspect reminds me of Kent Wills' famous quotes.
>
>Well gag you certaily kow how the legal system works. After all,
>you've had many experiences and even some time being locked up to
>prove it.
He was convicted of beating his ex-wife TWICE.
You'll note from his posts that he is unable to admit his
responsibility. It was all her fault.
I'm certainly no expert on abusers, and this question isn't meant to
imply you are, but isn't it the norm for abusers to state the victim made
them do it?
>
> I've said what constitutes proof for me. If you and " legal expert"
>Tjab want to claim what you have is legal proof, feel free to submit
>such in a court of law. I am not in " denial" I SAID I would start to
>believe you people IF you provided scanned copies of the legal court
>documents available at the courthouse in question.
Heck, tjab claimed in a thread about the documents at the court house
that he had seen them.
I still find it amusing how quickly you proved he lied.
>I've been pretty
>damn clear about that. And as gagg is the one closest to the
>courthouse in question, it would be worth a day's trip for him to
>travel there and get his greasy fat hands on the documents.
I'm a bit amazed that tjab didn't get copies when he was there.
Oh yeah. You already proved he lied about that.
It would be easiest for Greg, from a distance POV. However, Greg
simply can't afford it.
>If funds
>are a problem, it seems to me that the rest of the Jerk Circle could
>pitch in and send him some money, as the results would be undeniable.
>If you are correct inthat Kent WIlls does have a criminal record and
>these cases do exist in the courthouse files, then you can be
>triumphant in showing the proof and prove me wrong.
>
> However, if they do NOT exist......
>
> Perhaps that is why NONE of you have bothered to go that one final
>step. Instead, Eric/Jonesie lies about Kent's personal property and
>even claims Kent is pedophile.
Jonezie is upset that he outed himself as a baby raper.
You'll recall when I stated it was unlikely that he's a pedophile, he
stated I was wrong.
>And Tjab has to avoid admitting he
>lied about seeing the actual court documents.
A really DUMB thing to lie about, really.
I realize that tjab is blinded by his desire to finally get a win
against me, but he should have realized someone would want to see scans.
And no one would accept that he traveled to Iowa, saw the documents and
didn't bother getting copies.
>While you in your own
>legal problems avoid admitting you abused two women and a six year old
>girl,
We don't know that he's abused Lisa. It's very likely, given his
past,
but it's possible he's done nothing abusive to her.
He was convicted, twice, of beating his ex-wife and is on Iowa's
Child
Abuse Registry for his abuse of Lisa's daughter. And one doesn't get on
the
list because they didn't buy enough thin mints from a girl scout.
>even though by your own words any objective observer would say
>you were abusive.
Greg is the one who let everyone know he's a preditor.
>
> And may I add that Jonesie, who is so hot and bothered about
>pedpohilia, DOES NOT attack you for what you did to the six year old
>girl.
It just occured to me that Greg has never explained why he hung out
in
the bathroom while the six-year-old girl was showering.
>
> Meanwhile Tjab,. who called me a " potty mouth" doesn't attack
>Jonesie/Eric for his repeated vulgarity on me and Kent.
Tjab is extremely hypocritical. Old news.
>
> Interesting how hypocritical you three are.
>
>By comparison, Kent and I come up looking like roses.
Does this mean we have to stand in compost? :-)
--
"Jek rat, jek jakha, jek dji, jek ****h, jek baht."
Romani: [We are of the] Same blood, the same eyes,
the same soul, the same belly, and of one happiness.
|
