On Mar 25, 12:29=A0am, Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:59:56 -0500, Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:24:28 -0700 (PDT), LK <Patis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >wrote:
>
> >[...]
>
> >>> >>>> and if he didn't that's fine, if he did then he is
> >>> >>>> lying. =A0However, if it is the case that he didn't see such an
e=
mail,
> >>> >>>> then he could very well have gotten the information second
hand. =
=A0If
> >>> >>>> that is the case then fine, but he claims to never have had ANY
> >>> >>>> conversation about me outside of this group. =A0If he didn't
then=
that's
> >>> >>>> fine, if he did he's lying.
> >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Once again, I've had NO
discussion/conversation/ch=
at/whatever
> >>> >>> about you anywhere but on Usenet.
>
> >>> >> Liar.
>
> >>> >PROVE IT! OR STFU!
>
> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 He's Greg's lap dog. =A0He'll never offer proof of
any=
thing.
>
> >>Resorting to insult doesn't make you any less of a liar Kent. =A0It
just=
> >>shows how well you take loosing an argument.
>
> > =A0 =A0Your inability to offer anything to prove your assigning claim
> >noted.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Additional:
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 I note you've chosen NOT to accept my challenge.
=A0Pity. =
=A0If,
> as you've been implying, I couldn't offer links, it would mean I would
> be gone from Usenet.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Of course, you knew, or strongly suspected, that I would
b=
e
> able to offer links. =A0It was a risk you simply couldn't take, since
> being wrong would mean you would have to leave Usenet.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 I expected as much, actually.
>
Since you have no links to offer. I'd have nothing to worry about.
> --
> Kent
> When the world ends, there'll be no more air. That's why it's
> im****tant to pollute the air now. =A0Before it's too late. :)
|
