On Mar 24, 11:59=A0pm, Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:24:28 -0700 (PDT), LK <Patis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> >>>> and if he didn't that's fine, if he did then he is
> >> >>>> lying. =A0However, if it is the case that he didn't see such an
em=
ail,
> >> >>>> then he could very well have gotten the information second hand.
=
=A0If
> >> >>>> that is the case then fine, but he claims to never have had ANY
> >> >>>> conversation about me outside of this group. =A0If he didn't
then =
that's
> >> >>>> fine, if he did he's lying.
> >> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Once again, I've had NO
discussion/conversation/cha=
t/whatever
> >> >>> about you anywhere but on Usenet.
>
> >> >> Liar.
>
> >> >PROVE IT! OR STFU!
>
> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 He's Greg's lap dog. =A0He'll never offer proof of
anyt=
hing.
>
> >Resorting to insult doesn't make you any less of a liar Kent. =A0It
just
> >shows how well you take loosing an argument.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Your inability to offer anything to prove your assigning
c=
laim
> noted.
>
As is yours.
KW > I have no idea if a Cuban jail is a place I would want to be.
> --
> Kent
> When the world ends, there'll be no more air. That's why it's
> im****tant to pollute the air now. =A0Before it's too late. :)
|
