Re: prof_jonez mocks hackers

In article <ko2084165ehudoiiqged9ib8dd25ksvpri@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Kent Wills  <compuelf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 17 Jul 2008 22:35:24 -0400, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) wrote:
>
>>In article <j4vs7412dmqqqqrgv38423fd0l92iqpfao@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>Kent Wills  <compuelf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>On 16 Jul 2008 09:53:54 -0400, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>>>> It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
>>>>>>make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
>>>>>
>>>>>    To be fair, tjab was the first one to make the claim.  
>>>>
>>>>I was? Cite?
>>>>
>>>
>>>    Yes.
>>
>>Did you forget to include a cite?
>
>     No.
>     You have confused a lack of desire with a laps in memory.

You have confused a lack of ability with a lack of desire.

>>
>>>>>Like
>>>>>Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
>>>>
>>>>Pretty funny, coming from you, who has offered no evidence other than
your
>>>>worthless word that it was Jonez.
>>>
>>>    Yet you commented on part of the evidence by calling it, and I
>>>quote you, "Bull****."
>>
>>Bull**** is not evidence. Neither is simple assertion, which is all
>>you have to offer.
>>
>
>     You commented on other aspects of the evidence.

Pointing out that what you call evidence is not evidence is not
"commenting on the evidence."

>     Did you forget how you wanted his E-mail address to be his nym?

A semantic quibble that is irrelevant to your assertion, given that the
poster in question forged numerous email addresses and nyms alike.

Incidentally, what is the source of your delusion that I wanted his/her
email address to be his/her nym? 

>     You may as well give up.  No amount of your dishonesty will ever
>alter the truth.

No amount of projection will alter the simple fact that you are a
compulsive liar.

As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your posts.