Re: Kent Wills, the pig-ignorant lying ****wipe

"Kent Wills" <compuelf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:9b0t74tc8o7kfntkf8q97gm5c6hgua0ag1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:15:09 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
> <fvrnite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> [Various snips for brevity and of items for which I have no comment]]
>
>>> > When did he ever say it was a " hacker" Jonez? Do try to manage to
>>> >keep you many lies straight.
>>>
>>> I've never claimed it was a hacker. I think it was Greg who first
>>> made the claim it was a hacker. It may have been tjab, but I'm
>>> thinking it was Greg.
>>
>>They don"t know the distinction between an " inside" job and an
>>outsider altering a web site without permision.
>>
>
>     I think they do.
>    Greg is unable to be honest.  I'm certain tjab can, but has found
> he can't win if he is, so he's using deception.
>    Sadly, tjab still loses every time.
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >> Or the "hacker" that Kent *the lying asswipe* Wills claims
>>> >> he hired to "trace" those self-fabricated "threatening" posts
>>> >> he made via motz?
>>>
>>> > First off, the post TRACE was not by a hacker.
>>>
>>> When has Jonezie ever let the truth factor in?
>>
>> Never. I doubt he even knows what the truth is.
>
>    If he can be honest, it's clear he doesn't want to be.
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> > It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
>>> >make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
>>>
>>> To be fair, tjab was the first one to make the claim. Like
>>> Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
>>> All they have is that I, like many, have an account with Motz.
>>> And that's not proof, unless they want to claim everyone who has an
>>> account, as Jonezie once did, wrote the posts.
>>
>> Yeah I rememeber that now. One problem with their claim is that
>>ANYONE can use motz-- including Jonez. IOW their accusation does not
>>eliminate him. They might as well claim _I_ made those posts.
>
>     Anyone with access *could* have done it.  This is why the trace
> was needed.  Everyone who was able to go on-line nation was a
> potential suspect at the beginning.
>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Or would that "hacker" be one of your
>>> >> professors at that estemed "college" you claim you not
>>> >> only attended, but somehow mananged to graduate from?
>>> >> Please, you lying ****, anything but the dreaded "hacker".
>>>
>>> > Mock all you want, jerk. You mouth off one too many times with your
>>> >crap and someone who CAN hack will decide to teach you a lesson. If
>>> >Kent's IP friend can trace the white supremacist racist's posts to
>>> >your city, someone sure as hell can go a few steps further. Piss off
>>> >the wrong person, Jonesie.
>>>
>>> Sadly, Jonezie is too stupid to understand.
>>
>>It's only his luck so far that he hasn't pissed one off enugh to be in
>>their virtual crosshairs.
>>
>
>     I can assure him, and every one else, he's safe from me.  The
> best I could do is some script kitty work, and that would be rather
> useless, really.

It's script *kiddie* you stump-stupid stammering lying asswipe.


>     I am certainly not a hacker.

Nor are you a christian.