Re: Foreverlying**** CONFESSES that KENT made the "threatening" posts.

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:40:40 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
<theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:36:38 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>> <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:07:37 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
>>>> <fvrnite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>> Why not? When you posted under that white supremacist racist last
>>>>>>> year I deliberately baited you on to post more so the posts can
>>>>>>> be traced back to you. Kent and I got you and you fell for my
>>>>>>> trap, like the idiot you are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wow, just like on da tee vee, where they gots ta keep the guy on
>>>>>> da line long enough for the "trace" to go through, and for
>>>>>> dramatic effect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But thanks for finally confessing that Kent was in on the
>>>>>> pur****ted "threatening" posts, you pig-ignorant ****eater.- Hide
>>>>>> quoted text -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>> It wasafter he returned, coward.
>>>>
>>>>    It's another example of a Jonezie Lie [tm].
>>>>
>>>>> You can spew your ****ed-up spin all
>>>>> you want, you know damn well thar I lead youon long enough to get
>>>>> you racist ass. You made enough posts in a short period of time
>>>>> that the various paths lead striaght to you.
>>>>
>>>>     One post would be enough for a trace.
>>>
>>>
>>> So moe is the lying ****, eh Kent?
>>
>>    No.
>
>Then you're the lying ****, eh Kent?

   No.

>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> However, Jonezie's
>>>> multiple threats made for a stronger case with which to involve law
>>>> enforcement.
>>>
>>> You're lying again, Kunt.
>>>
>>
>>   Prove it.
>
>You've already done so.

   Liar.

>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your subject header is once agian misleading, as usual.. Kent did
>>>>> NOT make the threatening posts to himself, and you damn well know
>>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>>    Can you name one time when Jonezie has been honest?   He may be
>>>> able, but it's clear he has NO interest in being honest about
>>>> anything at any time.  Ever.
>>>
>>> Why do you habitually lie?
>>
>>    Prove it's a lie.
>
>Ipso facto.
>
 
    You can't.  Little wonder since, unlike you, I have no need to
lie.

>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You
>>>>> are so obsessed about Kent Wills that you couldn't bear  his
>>>>> absense from usenet so you made an account to attack him viciously.
>>>>
>>>>     An early theory I had regarding his threats was that he hoped I
>>>> had been lying about going to El Salvador and Honduras.  He hoped
>>>> that by posting the threats, I would feel compelled to post replies.
>>>
>>> Is that how you thought your little charade would be received?
>>
>>    There would need to be a charade.
>
>Already established.

    Not in the minds of mentally sound people.  YMMV, of course.

>
>>    Prove your implication that it was a charade and not you
>> expressing your racial hate.
>
>What "racial hate" ?
>

     The one in your posts, dullard.
     Or are you using the fact that Hispanic isn't really a race to
justify your lying about your posts?

>
>>
>>>
>>>>     Too bad for him I was in Central America, and not bothering with
>>>> the Internet in any fa****on.
>>>
>>> Prove it, liar.
>>>
>>
>>    Were there any posts from me during the time?
>
>Besides the forgeries?
>

    Since I posted no forgeries, your answer must be no.

>> Is there anything to
>> sup****t a claim I visited any part of the Internet while in Central
>> America?
>
>Threre's nothing to sup****t that you were in Central America
>you lying piece of crap.

    Except for the evidence I presented.
    I'm sure you recall the pictures I made available, and my
challenge for anyone to prove they came from any source other than me
or Lindsay.

>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  How did the visit from the cops go, Eriic?
>>>>
>>>>     He ceased all posting for a while after they visited.
>>>
>>> Who's "Eriic"?
>>
>>     Relying on a spelling error only shows how desperate you are to
>> avoid the truth.
>
>You're lying again.
>

    You may call my truth lies, if your mind requires it.  Your
delusions do me no harm.  In fact, they bring me a small measure of
entertainment.

>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW I call myself a Wiccan, not a "witch".
>>>>>
>>>>> My my, you've been busy with posts.  Have a bad day, coward?
>>>>
>>>>     Maybe bad weather is preventing him from stalking the kids at
>>>> the playground.  It's a plausible explanation.
>>>
>>> Only to a lying burglar from Iowa.
>>>
>>
>>     Are there any here?
>
>At least one.
>

     Have you moved to Iowa and taken up burglary?  If so, I recommend
a different career.  It's my understanding that burglary is a 10 year
prison sentence.  It's possible to get on parole in a little over
three years, but then you'd have to deal with a parole officer.
     Best to get an honest job.

>
>"You are in the Kill File.  Have been for a while.
>Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
>reply to you."
>         -- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>
>"At this point Madeleine is equally alive and dead. "
>       -- Kent ignoramus Wills giving the Iowa version of Kwantum
Mahkaniks
>
>" Currently, we, citizens of the U.S., aren't allowed to go to
>Venezuela or Cuba.  My hope is that Venezuela's restriction will
>be lifted after the next election."
>      - Kent Wills 2007, lying jackass
>

     Again I win.
     You could at least pretend to debate me before posting your
acceptance of defeat.


-- 
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>

Deadrat:
> Sure.  I for Indian or N for Native?

Jonezie:
S for Savage.

Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F2svfk5U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>