Re: ForeverLying**** confesses that she is a Lying ****.

Deadrat wrote:
> forevernitefan <fvrnite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:31f72919-7e21-40b7-b4d6-39911b9160a1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> On Jul 13, 12:19 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>  BTW I noted you crossposted this to the alt wicca newsgroup. Did you
>> also post your kerosine and bonfire for the " witch" story story?
>>
>>
>>> forevernitefan wrote:
>
> <snip/>
>
>>
>>> You're a bitter, angry, man-hating hysterical female
>>> who's prone to habitual lying and delusional infantile fantasies.
>>
>>  Hmn, me man-hating. ( Looks at Chippendales Calendar and photos of
>> Welling).
>
> Anyone can play a straight chick in cyberspace.
>

Not very convincingly ...


> <snip/>
>
>>>
>>>> Do try to limit yur attacks on things you
>>>> know something about.
>>>> In this case youi are showing how morniic
>>>
>>> ^^^^
>> ^^^^^^^
>>>
>>> Stammer much, you illiterate imbecile ?
>>
>>  Alliteration is a cheap pretense for literacy,  Eric.
>
> Alliteration is the repetition of consonantal sounds at the
> beginnings of words.  That would be something like
>
>   Alliteration is a *ch*eap *ch*ance for *ch*umps to pretend to
> literacy
>
> The repetition of the short 'i' in *i*lliterate *i*mbecile is called
> assonance.
>
> I thought you said you went to college.

Clearly the College of Clueless Cretinoid ****s in Colchester Connecticut.


>
>> You never fail
>> to show me as much better than you in language and in intelligent
>> response.
>
> Oops!  Is your face red!
>
> <snip/>
>
>>  I am not Larry.
>
> Anyone can play at not being Larry in cyberspace.
>
> <snip/>
>
>>  Said by the prince of non seqtuiors
>
> 'I' before 'e' except after 'c'; 'u' after 'q' except before 't'?
>
>> and ad hominens.
>
> It's ad homine*m*.  "Ad" is a prepostion meaning against and takes the
> accusative, in this case of homo,hominis meaning "man," in the sense
> of person.
>
> An ad hominem argument is one that is against the person making the
> argument and not the argument itself.  In other words, an ad hominem
> argument says "You're wrong because of who or what you are."  For
> example, if I say, "The FISA law is bad because George Bush is for
> it." that's an ad hominem argument.  FISA is bad law regardless of
> Bush's stance on it. Saying otherwise is a good bet but a fallacious
> argument.
>
> Notice that abuse isn't an argument at all, let alone an ad hominem.
> Jonez is just insulting you.
>
> Didn't you say you went to college?

Any lying **** named moe can tell lies on Usenet.