Re: Kent Wills the Blasphemous Heretic will Burn in HELLFIRE for Eternity

"Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:JnCck.12914$jI5.11561@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Kent Wills <compuelf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:2ii5741nkmuh6uahf1eqeqt91rqr1o5onq@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:18:39 GMT, Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>  Jonez, had you bothered to actually understand the basics of
>>>> Christian theology, you would have known that Jesus Christ taught
>>>> love and forgiveness and compassion and that the judgement for sins
>>>> comes only by G-d/Jesus Christ on his throne on your day of
>>>> judgment. No human can percieve another's soul, much less inner
>>>> thoughts,
>>>
>>>And yet you do it all the time wrt Jonez.  Go figure.
>>
>>    Using what he presents.  If he's presented lies regarding his
>> feelings, that's his responsibility.
>
> What has he presented?  You think "conversations" with Jonez are to be
> judge like ordinary exchanges?  He's pretty cagey about saying what he
> thinks; he let's you jump to conclusions.

And without benefit of any parachute ... you'd think that Wile E Wills
would be tired of impacting terrain at terminal velocity by now.

>
>>>> and
>>>> therefore cannot fairly judge another in regards to heaven or hell.
>>>>
>>>>  Also the following verse of "judge not" says " for as you judge ,
>>>>  you
>>>> will be judged."   To put it another way, you  condemn others, you
>>>> yourself will be condemned.
>>>>
>>>>  Are you claiming to have  the authority to judge, punish and
>>>>  condmnm
>>>> me, Jonesie? (( Derisive laugh))
>>>
>>>Well, he clearly has the "authority" to judge you according to his own
>>>lights.
>>
>>     Everyone does.  However, Christians are warned that we'll be held
>> to those same standards.
>
> Doesn't seem to affect a lot of you for the better.  Just look at the
> exchanges between Jonez and the good Christians on this newsgroup.

The only "good" christian is a ...

>
>>>>> >>Everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to
>>>>> >>be put to
>>>>> >>death, whether small or great, whether man or woman. 2
>>>>> >>Chronicles 15:12-13 NAB
>>>>>
>>>>> >> If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your
>>>>> >> beloved wife, or
>>>>> >>you intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods,
>>>>> >>whom you and
>>>>> >>your fathers have not known, gods of any other nations, near at
>>>>> >>hand or far
>>>>> >>away, from one end of the earth to the other: do not yield to him
>>>>> >>or listen
>>>>> >>to him, nor look with pity upon him, to spare or ****eld him, but
>>>>> >>kill him.
>>>>> >>Your hand shall be the first raised to slay him; the rest of the
>>>>> >>people shall join in with you. You shall stone him to death,
>>>>> >>because he sought
>>>>> >>to
>>>>> >>lead you astray from the Lord, your God, who brought you out of
>>>>> >>the lan of
>>>>> >>Egypt, that place of slavery. And all Israel, hearing of this,
>>>>> >>shall fear
>>>>> >>and never do such evil as this in your midst. Deuteronomy
>>>>> >>13:7-12 NAB
>>>>>
>>>>> > Do to others as you would have them do to you. Luke 6:31
>>>>> > (NIV)
>>>>>
>>>>> So you reject the rest of God's Word in the Bible, save this
>>>>> singular assertion
>>>>> from Luke, eh blasphemer?
>>>>
>>>>  Jonez, had you actually studied Christian teachings you would know
>>>> that there is a big difference between OT and NT law. You would also
>>>> have understood that the application of biblical commands is subject
>>>> to human choice. Since we now do not own slaves, obviously the OT
>>>> commands about slavery no longer apply. And while I've heard some
>>>> Christians make pretzel-logic excuses for certain things in the Old
>>>> Testament, I've also heard Christians explain that the OT laws were
>>>> ine ffect done away with on the cross where Jesus Christ was
>>>> crucified. And the new law, as explained by Jesus, was all about
>>>> love, not hate. Did you by any chance misunderstand the parable of
>>>> the Good Samaritan?
>>>
>>>How about the parable of the church's 1965 year war against Jews for
>>>the killing of your god?
>>
>>      Since Moe's not a Christian, your question doesn't make much
>> sense.
>
> The argument doesn't really rely on what Moe is.  In the first place,
> anyone can play Samantha in cyberspace.  Secondly, see above where it
> sqays "had you actually studied Christian teachings"?  It's pointless to
> throw "Christian teachings" at Jonez.

"I'm rubber, you're glue ..."

>
>>>>  And calling someone a blasphemer is ironic considering your rabid
>>>> hatred for Jehovah.
>>>
>>>He doesn't hate Jehovah.
>>
>>     He certainly does, or he really wants people to think he does.
>>     If he doesn't, but only wants people to think he does, then he has
>> some issues that really need to be addressed.
>
> Jonez isn't much of an explainer.  But it seems to me that his tirades
> makes more sense directed at people.
>
>>>He might hate you, but then again "[n]o
>>>human can percieve another's soul, much less inner thoughts," eh?
>>
>>     Unless they make it clear how they feel/think.
>
> Ah!  But Jonez' specialty is not making it clear.  It's clear what *you*
> think, though.  Or are you faking the outrage?  Can another person ever
> really tell?

Kent "the liar" Wills claims both Yes and No, depending on his personal
prejudices, bigotry and ignorance..

>
>>>Really, trying to reason with Jonez about your religion just makes you
>>>look silly.
>>
>>      Trying to reason with Jonezie is starting to loose it's interest
>> with me.
>
> I predict that's not the case.  Just a guess.

<and even Vegas won't lay odds against that>

>> It's clear he isn't able to comprehend anything outside of
>> his small world view.
>
> Might that just be projection?  Just another guess.

Ziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing!

LOL!