Re: => 17 Catholic High School ****s in Pregnancy Pact <= Christian

On Jul 3, 11:03=A0am, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) wrote:
> In article
<8b043893-6169-426b-9eda-1f40135b0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
>
>
>
>
> forevernitefan =A0<fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Jun 28, 2:17=3DA0am, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) wrote:
> >> In article
<x-9479B6.20485027062...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> >> Larry =3DA0<x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >In article <g42s86$...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab)
> >> >wrote:
>
> >> >> In article
<x-C464C3.21083926062...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> >> Larry =3DA0<x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >In article <g4061i$...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab)
> >> >> >wrote:
>
> >> >> >> In article
<x-91465C.23272025062...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>,
> >> >> >> Larry =3DA0<x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >In article <ptv5641rvapmhoksmrsp9gee6rq52i8...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> >> >> > Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> On 25 Jun 2008 13:21:38 -0400, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab)
wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> [...]
>
> >> >> >> >> >>> I then asked you:
>
> >> >> >> >> >>> 1) Do you claim that Jonez has authored posts which
inclu=
de h=3D
> >ateful
> >> >> >> >> >>> comments based on others' religion, race, perceived
***ua=
l
> >> >> >> >> >>> orientation,
> >> >> >> >> >>> and the like, in which he has called for death and/or
ser=
ious=3D
>
> >> >> >> >> >>> injuries
> >> >> >> >> >>> to befall those people?
>
> >> >> >> >> >>> Well?
>
> >> >> >> >> >>Isn't it obvious from my question to you that I do make
tha=
t cl=3D
> >aim?
>
> >> >> >> >> >Is that a yes?
>
> >> >> >> >> >It's obvious from your question that you're trying to make
t=
hat =3D
> >claim
> >> >> >> >> >without coming out and saying it. Why? Because then you
migh=
t ha=3D
> >ve to
> >> >> >> >> >defend your claim with an example. And apparently you
can't.
>
> >> >> >> >> >Let me help: an example would be, say, Jonez saying that
our=
 mis=3D
> >sion
> >> >> >> >> >is to "crush the Sunnis and ****ites" in Iraq. Of course
that=
's j=3D
> >ust an
> >> >> >> >> >example -- he didn't say it, you did.
>
> >> >> >> >> =3DA0 =3DA0 Larry never said that. =3DA0Post the MID for any
=
message wh=3D
> >ere he did.
> >> >> >> >> Bar your lying, you'll be able.
>
> >> >> >> >> >Your turn: where do you see Jonez calling for death and/or
s=
erio=3D
> >us
> >> >> >> >> >injuries to befall a group of people based on their
religion=
, ra=3D
> >ce,
> >> >> >> >> >or ***ual orientation?
>
> >> >> >> >> =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0Would his post under the nym UltraMan do?
>
> >> >> >> >> "Witch arrested during new moon ritual <=3D3D get the stake
a=
nd ker=3D
> >osene
> >> >> >> >> ready"
>
> >> >> >> >> Message-ID: <5iieliF3pnbp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> >> >> >> >> =3DA0 =3DA0How will you spin it?
>
> >> >> >> >Oooh, that's a good one. =3DA0I can't wait to see tjab's
lingui=
stic
> >> >> >> >gymnastics to explain his way out of this one.
>
> >> >> >> Larry, are you truly as sarcasm-impaired as Kent? Who ties your
=
shoe=3D
> >s
> >> >> >> for you in the morning?
>
> >> >> >Sarcasm, Kent! =3DA0Tjab went the sarcasm route! =3DA0I didn't
see=
 that on=3D
> >e
> >> >> >coming.... I expected him to go for some strange rationalization.
>
> >> >> >So now you have it. =3DA0Jonez doesn't call for death or injury
to=
 anyon=3D
> >e,
> >> >> >he's just being sarcastic.
>
> >> >> Only a moron could look at that post and think that UltraMan was
ca=
llin=3D
> >g
> >> >> for witches to be killed.
>
> >> >He said to get the stake and kerosene ready. =3DA0Certainly you know
=
that i=3D
> >n
> >> >the past, witches were burned at the stake. =3DA0If you don't see
thi=
s as a=3D
>
> >> >call to do the same to this accused witch, I don't know what you see
=
it
> >> >as.
>
> >> >Oh yeah. =3DA0Sarcasm.
>
> >> >> =3DA0I don't think you're a moron, for which you
> >> >> would bear no moral responsibility, so I can only conclude that
you=
're =3D
> >a
> >> >> liar,
> >> >> for which you do.
>
> >> >What am I lying about? =3DA0You asked if he's called for death or
inj=
ury to=3D
>
> >> >people based on, among other categories, their religious views.
=3DA0=
Kent
> >> >responded to the challenge, to which the best you can muster is to
> >> >defend it as sarcasm.
>
> >> >So I guess you would have to admit that Jonez sarcastically called
fo=
r
> >> >the death of a woman based on her religious views? =3DA0It's so
half-=
hearte=3D
> >d
> >> >as to be laughable, but its a start.
>
> >> I see you've lost any remaining shred of self-respect. With good
reaso=
n.
>
> >> What a clown.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > YOU'RE defending a racist misogynsitic pedophile who verbally abused
> >you, Tjab.
>
> More bull****.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

 Oh really? Look at the damn posts for yourself Tjab. HE ATTACKED
YOU!! What were the common themes of this racist? " Paedophila",
demeaning me because I'm female ( misogyny) and his " white is right"
kill race traitors rants ( racism).

 If you can't see that this adds up to a racist misogynistic pedophile
who also had posts attacking you, then you are dumber than crap, Tjab.

  Damn you are stupid!!

Moe
 Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/