Re: => 17 Catholic High School ****s in Pregnancy Pact <= Christian

In article
<8b043893-6169-426b-9eda-1f40135b073a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
forevernitefan  <fvrnite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Jun 28, 2:17=A0am, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) wrote:
>> In article <x-9479B6.20485027062...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Larry =A0<x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >In article <g42s86$...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab)
>> >wrote:
>>
>> >> In article
<x-C464C3.21083926062...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> Larry =A0<x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >In article <g4061i$...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab)
>> >> >wrote:
>>
>> >> >> In article
<x-91465C.23272025062...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>,
>> >> >> Larry =A0<x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> >In article <ptv5641rvapmhoksmrsp9gee6rq52i8...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> >> > Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> On 25 Jun 2008 13:21:38 -0400, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> [...]
>>
>> >> >> >> >>> I then asked you:
>>
>> >> >> >> >>> 1) Do you claim that Jonez has authored posts which
include h=
>ateful
>> >> >> >> >>> comments based on others' religion, race, perceived ***ual
>> >> >> >> >>> orientation,
>> >> >> >> >>> and the like, in which he has called for death and/or
serious=
>
>> >> >> >> >>> injuries
>> >> >> >> >>> to befall those people?
>>
>> >> >> >> >>> Well?
>>
>> >> >> >> >>Isn't it obvious from my question to you that I do make that
cl=
>aim?
>>
>> >> >> >> >Is that a yes?
>>
>> >> >> >> >It's obvious from your question that you're trying to make
that =
>claim
>> >> >> >> >without coming out and saying it. Why? Because then you might
ha=
>ve to
>> >> >> >> >defend your claim with an example. And apparently you can't.
>>
>> >> >> >> >Let me help: an example would be, say, Jonez saying that our
mis=
>sion
>> >> >> >> >is to "crush the Sunnis and ****ites" in Iraq. Of course
that's j=
>ust an
>> >> >> >> >example -- he didn't say it, you did.
>>
>> >> >> >> =A0 =A0 Larry never said that. =A0Post the MID for any message
wh=
>ere he did.
>> >> >> >> Bar your lying, you'll be able.
>>
>> >> >> >> >Your turn: where do you see Jonez calling for death and/or
serio=
>us
>> >> >> >> >injuries to befall a group of people based on their religion,
ra=
>ce,
>> >> >> >> >or ***ual orientation?
>>
>> >> >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0Would his post under the nym UltraMan do?
>>
>> >> >> >> "Witch arrested during new moon ritual <=3D get the stake and
ker=
>osene
>> >> >> >> ready"
>>
>> >> >> >> Message-ID: <5iieliF3pnbp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> >> >> >> =A0 =A0How will you spin it?
>>
>> >> >> >Oooh, that's a good one. =A0I can't wait to see tjab's
linguistic
>> >> >> >gymnastics to explain his way out of this one.
>>
>> >> >> Larry, are you truly as sarcasm-impaired as Kent? Who ties your
shoe=
>s
>> >> >> for you in the morning?
>>
>> >> >Sarcasm, Kent! =A0Tjab went the sarcasm route! =A0I didn't see that
on=
>e
>> >> >coming.... I expected him to go for some strange rationalization.
>>
>> >> >So now you have it. =A0Jonez doesn't call for death or injury to
anyon=
>e,
>> >> >he's just being sarcastic.
>>
>> >> Only a moron could look at that post and think that UltraMan was
callin=
>g
>> >> for witches to be killed.
>>
>> >He said to get the stake and kerosene ready. =A0Certainly you know
that i=
>n
>> >the past, witches were burned at the stake. =A0If you don't see this
as a=
>
>> >call to do the same to this accused witch, I don't know what you see
it
>> >as.
>>
>> >Oh yeah. =A0Sarcasm.
>>
>> >> =A0I don't think you're a moron, for which you
>> >> would bear no moral responsibility, so I can only conclude that
you're =
>a
>> >> liar,
>> >> for which you do.
>>
>> >What am I lying about? =A0You asked if he's called for death or injury
to=
>
>> >people based on, among other categories, their religious views.
=A0Kent
>> >responded to the challenge, to which the best you can muster is to
>> >defend it as sarcasm.
>>
>> >So I guess you would have to admit that Jonez sarcastically called for
>> >the death of a woman based on her religious views? =A0It's so
half-hearte=
>d
>> >as to be laughable, but its a start.
>>
>> I see you've lost any remaining shred of self-respect. With good
reason.
>>
>> What a clown.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> YOU'RE defending a racist misogynsitic pedophile who verbally abused
>you, Tjab.

More bull****.