On Jun 28, 7:30=A0pm, Larry <x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <9ejd64l26a8ffv9i4nr6qcokik2o9uu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> =A0Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:08:58 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
> > <thep...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> > >>>>>> =A0 Point out where in the article any religious view
>
> > >>>>> Re-read the article you stammering jackass.
>
> > >>>> Why not respond
>
> > >>> Why do you habitually lie?
>
> > >> Read the thread entitled "Jonez Gets His Bluff Called, Then Shows
> > >> He's a Chicken!" and show me where you replied, you lying liar.
>
> > >From
>
> > >: < 19ranger57_at_earthlink.net>
> > >Date
>
> > >: 18 Jun 2005 05:01:37 -0700
>
> > =A0 =A0 So you posted as Ken, three years before the thread appeared?
>
> > > "- Prof. Jonez=A9" wrote:
>
> > > =A0[snip]
>
> > >> Here's the Greivance information, now all we need to do is identify
=
the
> > >> unethical slimball lawyer named "Larry" ...
>
> > >> First Department Disciplinary Committee
> > >> New York & Bronx Counties
> > >> Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department
> > >> 61 Broadway, 2nd Floor
> > >> New York, NY 10006
> > >> (212) 401-0800
>
> > > =A0As I pointed out elsewhere, "Larry" has been identified as Larry
G=
lasser,
>
> > =A0 =A0 Ken firmly believes the Larry we know is Larry Glasser.
>
> Ken has also been denied a law license because of psychological
> concerns. =A0So consider the source.
May I say in Ken Smith's defense that the reason why they called for
a psych evaluation in the first place was because of outside influence
on one of the judges connected to Smith's exposure of Bob Larson's
nefarious activities. When Larson sued Smith, Smith won the lawsuit.
Larry, I've been watchng some of Bob Larson's activities since his
"Talk Back" radio show in 1985. Larson is the type of psycopathic
individual that would take sneaky revenge on his critics. And Smith
was instrumental in exposing certain activities of BL and his "
ministry", leading to Larson's steep decline in religious radio and
Larson being persona non grata in religious publi****ng.
If Ken Smith was not a reliable source, Larson would have had him
from the get-go. It is concievable that Larson too revenge by
influencing behind the scenes the judges requiering Ken to submit to a
psych evaluation.
BTW Larry he passed the psych test.
>
> > =A0There is
> > evidence that gives reason to suspect he is, but I've not seen
> > anything that proves it.
>
> > >as
> > >Glasser's posts make no sense if he is not our Larry.
> > >Moreover, *our* Larry has
> > >identified himself as a NY ADA,
>
> > =A0 =A0 I've not checked, but I'm confident there are a few ADA's in
th=
e
> > burrows that make up NYC who are named Larry.
>
> I know at least six, as I've previously said (why this is on Jonez's
> list of quotes from me, I'm not quite sure), and they're from two of the
> five DA offices in the city.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >and the chance that there are two Larry Glassers
> > >working for that office are almost infinitesmal.
>
> > =A0 =A0 Bordering on zero.
> > =A0 =A0 This doesn't alter the simple truth that no proof that Larry
is
> > Larry Glasser has been presented.
>
> > >It's certainly enough evidence
> > >to establish probable cause, which is all we have to do to initiate a
> > >grievance.
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0On what grounds?
> > =A0 =A0 =A0Disagreeing with someone isn't grounds for a grievance.
=A0I=
f it
> > were, I would have been able to file one on our disagreement regarding
> > Ken's case. =A0Had I done so, such a grievance should and would have
> > been laughed out of the office.
>
> It would be something if Jonzey did. =A0An anonymous greivance from out
o=
f
> the state (or out of the country) by someone who has never had
> professional dealings with me would not be given much consideration, as
> you could imagine, while if he wanted to be taken seriously, he'd have
> to provide a name, address, and other contact information.
Jonesie is like the monkeys at the zoo. Her'll hurl his feces because
that's the best he can do and he can't get to any o fus in any other
way.
And cowards like attacking from safety.
BTW this attacking of Larry based on hackneyed, crappy " research"
looks similar to the attacks on Kent Wills as the " garage burglar"
crap.
Simply put, his research methods are scattershot and as pointless as
he is.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
>
>
>
> > > =A0What investigation? I already told you I am for any founded =A0
> > > =A0investigation of
> > >police or prosecutorial misconduct. I think =A0 any abuse of power --
=
not only
> > >in
> > >the legal field, but bank =A0 tellers diverting funds from
depositors'
> > >accounts,
> > >etc., should =A0 all be dealt with harshly.
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0I agree with that sentiment.
>
> What's not to agree with?
>
> > > =A0a.. Larry Glasser, 19 Oct. 2002
>
> Again, not only isn't this me, I don't know what this date represents.
>
> It isn't my birthday, the day I took the bar exam, the day I was
> admitted to the bar, or any other date of significance in my life or
> career.
>
> > > =A0Of course, Larry has carved out an exception for abuse of power
by=
judges,
> > >particularly when a person whose views he does not like is on the
busi=
ness
> > >end
> > >of the transaction.
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 I don't see any such exception in the quote.
>
> There is no exception in the quote, because there is no exception in my
> belief. =A0Ironically, I'm having a real, substantive debate with
someone
> in another NG (I was shocked to find out they really could happen on
> usenet) in which we're discussing how the public having trust and faith
> in the judiciary and legal system is critically im****tant to our
country.
>
> > >But he didn't carve out an exception for himself, which is
> > >of paramount im****tance when considering his re****ted conduct in the
> > >incident
> > >spawning the Saudi Times article.
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0While I find Larry Glasser's wish to have past arrests,
WITH=
OUT
> > convictions, used against the demonstrators a horrible act, I'm
> > confident the counsel for the demonstrators brought up the matter.
> > They would have to be more incompetent than you, Jonezie. I can't
> > accept this as plausible.
> > =A0 =A0 =A0If our Larry is Larry Glasser, the matter has to have been
> > resolved by now.
>
> I'm not even sure I know what you're talking about. =A0An arrest cannot
b=
e
> used against someone as evidence at trial that they committed that crime
> for which they had been arrested, and I don't know of any exception to
> this whatsoever. =A0I certainly would not try to introduce such evidence
> at a trial. =A0And presuming the Saudi Times is a newspaper from Saudi
> Arabia (just a guess on my part) why would they care about New York
> rules of evidence? =A0Did they cover the RNC protests in New York City?
=
=A0
> How about the Sean Bell protests in which Al Sharpton was arrested a few
> months ago?
>
> > > =A0Still, the most telling phrase is "I already told you I am,"
indic=
ating
> > > =A0that
> > >Larry Glasser had said something previously in that thread. Problem
is=
, once
> > >again, it is the first post by Larry Glasser *AS Larry Glasser* in
the
> > >thread.
> > >The only way that that phrase can possibly make sense is if our Larry
=
is
> > >Larry
> > >Glasser.
>
> > =A0 =A0 As I pointed out in another post, quoting Solar is not quoting
> > Larry.
> > =A0 =A0 Quoting Ken is also not quoting Larry.
> > =A0 =A0 I asked for the MIDs of posts from Larry where he uses the
init=
ial
> > G. =A0I note you've been unable to offer even one. =A0
> > =A0 =A0 I'm not at all surprised.
>
> Who is?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
