Larry wrote:
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Larry wrote:
>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:23:02 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
>>>>> <Reality@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:x-3FB358.09091523062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> "Reality_Check©" <Reality@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Kent Wills" <compuelf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:4bup54p2661mj9v1fhagvcnnq5og6odchd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:31:21 -0400, default
>>>>>>>>> <default@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:12:52 -0500, Kent Wills
>>>>>>>>>> <compuelf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:54:23 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
>>>>>>>>>>> <Reality@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Did teen mothers-to-be make pregnancy pact?
>>>>>>>>>>>> At least 17 students in one Massachusetts high school are
>>>>>>>>>>>> expecting
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> By KATIE ZEZIMA
>>>>>>>>>>>> New York Times News Service
>>>>>>>>>>>> Published on: 06/19/08
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> BOSTON - At least 17 girls at the public high school in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> seaside town
>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A **PUBLIC** high school.
>>>>>>>>>>> Another of your lies is exposed. You claim in the
>>>>>>>>>>> subject "Catholic High School" and the first sentence
>>>>>>>>>>> states it's a public school.
>>>>>>>>>>> Why are you unable to be honest?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> His statement doesn't necessarily say it was a Catholic
>>>>>>>>>> school - that's what you read.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Catholic High School ****s" can mean High School age women
>>>>>>>>>> who are Catholic.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fair enough.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kent the lyin' Polack Wills admits he's a lying Polack.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You either called the school Catholic,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really are dumber than a 5th grader, aren't you lyin' Larry?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> when its not, or the girls Catholic, when there's no evidence
>>>>>>> to sup****t that claim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're lying again, lyin' Larry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you habitually lie?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Point out where in the article any religious view
>>>>
>>>> Re-read the article you stammering jackass.
>>>
>>>
>>> Why not respond
>>
>> Why do you habitually lie?
>
> Read the thread entitled "Jonez Gets His Bluff Called, Then Shows
> He's a Chicken!" and show me where you replied, you lying liar.
From
: < 19ranger57_at_earthlink.net>
Date
: 18 Jun 2005 05:01:37 -0700
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
[snip]
> Here's the Greivance information, now all we need to do is identify the
> unethical slimball lawyer named "Larry" ...
>
> First Department Disciplinary Committee
> New York & Bronx Counties
> Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department
> 61 Broadway, 2nd Floor
> New York, NY 10006
> (212) 401-0800
As I pointed out elsewhere, "Larry" has been identified as Larry
Glasser, as
Glasser's posts make no sense if he is not our Larry. Moreover, *our*
Larry has
identified himself as a NY ADA, and the chance that there are two Larry
Glassers
working for that office are almost infinitesmal. It's certainly enough
evidence
to establish probable cause, which is all we have to do to initiate a
grievance.
If someone did file a grievance against Glasser, he has made statements
he may
rue. For instance, this gem sounds like it could have come straight from
my
keyboard:
What investigation? I already told you I am for any founded
investigation of
police or prosecutorial misconduct. I think any abuse of power -- not
only in
the legal field, but bank tellers diverting funds from depositors'
accounts,
etc., should all be dealt with harshly.
a.. Larry Glasser, 19 Oct. 2002
Of course, Larry has carved out an exception for abuse of power by
judges,
particularly when a person whose views he does not like is on the business
end
of the transaction. But he didn't carve out an exception for himself,
which is
of paramount im****tance when considering his re****ted conduct in the
incident
spawning the Saudi Times article.
Still, the most telling phrase is "I already told you I am," indicating
that
Larry Glasser had said something previously in that thread. Problem is,
once
again, it is the first post by Larry Glasser *AS Larry Glasser* in the
thread.
The only way that that phrase can possibly make sense is if our Larry is
Larry
Glasser.
=================
Solar" <williamtmaxw...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
6/23/2005 9:02:47 AM
Wayne Delia wrote
"Let's not jump to hasty conclusions here. It's perfectly plausible, for
example, that Larry Whoever may have been at a party also attended by
Larry
Glasser, who got bored, snuck into the computer room, made Post
larry-g-1607022140530...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
got hungry, left the computer room
with
the computer still on, and went out to the living room for some of those
little
hot dogs in the little bread rolls, when Larry Whoever saw the light on,
entered
the computer room, saw the Usenet client up, read someone making a
compliment
about Larry Glasser, wrote a response in post Message-ID:
none-1607022203380...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
as if was directed toward himself
(Larry
Whoever), because Larry Whoever was obsessively fixated on Larry Glasser,
to the
point of imitating the career and interests of the man who was still in
the
living room stuffing his face with those little hot dogs in the little
bread
rolls (and now consuming shots of alcohol), when Larry Glasser realized he
left
the computer on, so he returned to the computer room just as Larry Whoever
was
leaving it, and they collided - POW! - causing Larry Whoever to fall at an
awkward angle, banging his head on the oak dresser, knocking him
unconscious,
and causing him amnesia, following which incident Larry Glasser attempted
a weak
coverup by making a mental note to avoid posting on Usenet again as Larry
Glasser, while Larry Whoever, with no memory of the whole incident,
continues to
post, now insisting he is not necessarily Larry Glasser, while failing to
confirm that he is not Larry Glasser."
Ziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing !!!!!!!!
Actually, "Larry Glasser" might prefer 'waffles' to the little hot
dogs. Some students at George Wa****ngton Law School may like to get
wild on the occasional Tuesday night... after all isnt that where John
Kerry went to law school <g> ???
Y'know, what could be even more amazing is that "Larry" might actually
prefer Wayne's theory over any that concludes that he actually IS
"Larry Glasser" <g>
But then if he goes that way, "Larry" cant deny that he is acquainted
with "Larry Glasser" enough to be able to use the same computer in less
than a half an hour to post in the same thread.
Whattaparadox.
---------------
have a QUIET day !!!!!!!!!
Solar
|
