Larry wrote:
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> tjab wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <x-1FFF11.21073826062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Larry
>>> <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> In article <g405of$3m1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(tjab)
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article
>>>>> <x-F61059.22113825062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Larry
>>>>> <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <g3uf0a$djk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(tjab)
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> <x-AD4E19.14531625062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>> Larry <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <g3tur2$baj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> (tjab) wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>> <x-198574.06464925062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>> Larry <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <g3sik4$fd8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>> (tjab) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>> <x-DE3335.00234025062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>> Larry <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <g3sgdk$epl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>> (tjab) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <x-D619E4.20372724062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Larry <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <g3ruk1$bnh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(tjab)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<x-ECB93A.19002624062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Larry <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <g3ru4o$bjd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(tjab)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<x-FD884F.18450524062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Larry <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <g3rt9r$bcg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(tjab)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <o8t264h6fuid83qa862mc0eh1ettaqtule@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Kent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wills <compuelf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24 Jun 2008 17:45:41 -0400, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (tjab) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In MID <6b8rctF3akaiiU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (to you)"Have you ever heard Jonze make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racist and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bigoted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or not?" he responded "You mean like when I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pig-ignorant white-trash s***bags?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After all your months of innuendo, the best you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can come
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Jonez (who I suspect is also white) called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you "white
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trash?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The best? Far from it. But I said Jonez
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> admitted to being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bigot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked for proof, and I provided proof where he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> admitted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That didn't sound like an admission to me, Larry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wouldn't, since you foolishly took the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> position that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bigot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wouldn't, because for all any of us other than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Larry and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonez
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is just one white person calling another white
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> white.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Calling someone "white trash" is the same as calling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them "white"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the linguistic gymnastics continue!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it's racist to call you "trash," or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "s***bag?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He didn't say trash. He said "white trash," which is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well-known
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phrase.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And what did you take him to mean by it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The same thing that everyone but you understands it to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mean, I imagine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Way to duck a question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Like you refusing to say whether you think "white trash"
>>>>>>>>>>>> is a racist
>>>>>>>>>>>> comment or not?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Old business before new:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Way to duck a question.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You asked me:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [Larry wrote]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Do you admit that Jonez has authored posts which include
>>>>>>>>>>> hateful comments based on others' religion, race, perceived
>>>>>>>>>>> ***ual orientation,
>>>>>>>>>>> and the like, in which he has called for death and/or
>>>>>>>>>>> serious injuries
>>>>>>>>>>> to befall those people?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I said no.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I then asked you:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Do you claim that Jonez has authored posts which include
>>>>>>>>>>> hateful comments based on others' religion, race, perceived
>>>>>>>>>>> ***ual orientation,
>>>>>>>>>>> and the like, in which he has called for death and/or
>>>>>>>>>>> serious injuries
>>>>>>>>>>> to befall those people?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it obvious from my question to you that I do make that
>>>>>>>>>> claim?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is that a yes?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's obvious from your question that you're trying to make
>>>>>>>>> that claim without coming out and saying it. Why? Because
>>>>>>>>> then you might have to defend your claim with an example. And
>>>>>>>>> apparently you can't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're so obtuse you require the word "yes"? OK: Yes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now answer my question. Is "white trash" a racist insult or
>>>>>>>> not?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's your answer: it depends on the speaker and the speaker's
>>>>>>> intent. Kinda like the "n-word."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "It depends"? When Jonez makes a racist comment, and I call him
>>>>>> out on it, to which he admits it was a "softball" for me, you
>>>>>> can't being yourself to admit that your hero made a racist
>>>>>> comment. When he called someone "white trash" you claim you
>>>>>> can't
>>>>>> tell if it is an insult or not because it depends on the
>>>>>> speaker's intent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, it was definitely an insult. What, are you really as
>>>>> slow-witted as he says?
>>>>
>>>> I called it an insult from day 1. You hemmed and hawwed and beat
>>>> around the bush until you had no option but to reluctantly admit
>>>> the inescapable truth.
>>>
>>> What inescapable truth is that?
>>
>> Certainly none of these ...
>>
>>
>> "What do you think a "DNA Warrant" is? There is no such thing."
>> -- Larry the legal stooge
>>
>> " [The Jury] might have unanimously found that he probably committed
>> the crime,
>> or likely committed them, or possibly committed them - *or* that he
>> was in fact
>> innocent."
>> -- Larry the idiot
>>
>> "The jury was hung. Whether it was hung 11 for the top count and 1
>> for a lesser count or 1 for the top count and 11 to acquit is of no
>> legal relevance in terms of bail."
>> -- Larry the legal imbecile
>>
>> " Actually, prisons are one of the few public places where
>> you can still smoke."
>> -- Larry the moron
>>
>> "There are over 1300 ADAs in New York City alone, and
>> I personally know at least a half-dozen named Larry or Lawrence."
>> -- Larry the eponymous fool
>>
>> " I don't know a single attorney, public or private,
>> who knows his/her attorney registration number."
>> -- Larry G. the habitual liar.
>>
>> "Plus, receiving stolen money (or property of any kind) is only a
>> crime if the recipient knows it is stolen"
>> -- Lyin' Larry, the legal jackass
>>
>>
>>>>>> Kent Wills: "I'm just the guy who can travel without
>>>>>> restriction to several Latin American countries."
>>
>>>>>> UM: "Why not all the Latin American countries then, eh Kent?"
>>
>>>>>> Larry G. the imbecile: "Federal law, dumbass. No citizen can go
>>>>>> to some of the nations from the US."
>>
>>
>> Larry the Imbecile claims that 0.625 grams is "far more than a gram"
>> and that a handcuffed man will "fall faster" when pushed off a cliff.
>>
>>
>>>>>> Q: And just what does a moron like you think a Townhouse is, eh
>>>>>> jackass ?
>>>>>> Larry the Ignoramus: "A dwelling, which is a type of structure or
>>>>>> building.
>>>>>> It is not, however, real
>>>>>> property."
>>
>>
>> "I never mentioned New York? That's so demonstrably false I'm still
>> laughing. Anytime I speak in anything resembling a specific, I make
>> it clear that I'm referring to NY statutes. I've never claimed to
>> know the details of criminal statutes in other jurisdictions."
>> -- Larry G. the Pathological Liar
>>
>> "Having private savings accounts comprise a part of social security
>> is not the same as privatizing social security."
>> -- Larry G., stammering imbecile
>>
>> "I happen to be a prosecutor in New York. "
>> -- Larry G. the habitual liar
>>
>> "I happen to be an Assistant District Attorney, and I have
>> absolute immunity for the charges I bring against someone.
>> Besides, someone being found "not guilty" does not mean they are
>> 'innocent.' "
>> -- Larry the amoral coward
>>
>> "Actually, as an Assistant District Attorney, I know precisely who
>> should be in
>> prison "
>> -- Larry G, fascist megalomaniac
>>
>> "I truly hope that if you ever come to my jurisdiction and commit a
>> crime, I am assigned to prosecute the case against you. I'd love to
>> show you up close and personal how good of a lawyer I am, fool."
>> -- Larry, the poor pathetic bastard
>
> I notice all of a sudden I became "Larry G." Is that a tacit
> admission you had your head up your ass about what my name really is?
1 LARRY FREDERICK GAINEN 1174622 NEW YORK NY 1975 Due to reregister
within 30
days of birthday
2 LARRY GANTT 2767796 NEW CITY NY 1996 Currently registered
3 LARRY F. GARDNER 1463298 WINDHAM NY 1979 Currently registered
4 LARRY J. GELBFISH 2175818 NEW YORK NY 1988 Currently registered
5 LARRY K. GERSTEIN 2296762 BROOKLYN NY 1977 Currently registered
6 LARRY GILBERTSON 1382613 1979 Currently registered
7 LARRY FLOYD GINSBURG 1042720 STAMFORD CT 1977 Currently registered
8 LARRY ALLEN GLASSER 4122024 NEW YORK NY 2003 Currently registered
9 LARRY IVAN GLICK 1728385 GARDEN CITY NY 1981 Currently registered
10 LARRY IRA GLUCK 1018175 NEW YORK NY 1978 Delinquent
11 LARRY GOANOS 2202935 SAN FRANCISCO CA 1988 Due to reregister within
30
days of birthday
12 LARRY MARTIN GORDON 1654847 GARDEN CITY NY 1974 Currently registered
13
LARRY S. GREENBERG 2204337 POTOMAC MD 1967 Suspended
14 LARRY STUART GREENFIELD 1490572 LOS ANGELES CA 1976 Due to reregister
within 30 days of birthday
15 LARRY WENDELL GRESENS 1652015 1964 Deceased
Well well, lyin' Larry. Here are all the lawyers in NY with the
name/initials
you've posted under, and only 1 (one) of them is an assistant DA as you've
claimed to be. Guess who?
So either admit that you've been lying all along (most likely given the
pathetic
dearth of your legal a***en) about being an ADA in New York, or admit that
you
are the idiot and imbecile Larry Allen Glasser, the dumbest most
pig-ignorant
legal jackass ever to be admitted to the NY Bar.
"I happen to be a prosecutor in New York. "
-- Larry the habitual liar Glasser
"I happen to be an Assistant District Attorney, and I have
absolute immunity for the charges I bring against someone.
Besides, someone being found "not guilty" does not mean they are
'innocent.' "
-- Larry the amoral coward
"Actually, as an Assistant District Attorney, I know precisely who should
be in
prison "
-- Larry Glasser, fascist megalomaniac
"I truly hope that if you ever come to my jurisdiction and commit a
crime, I am assigned to prosecute the case against you. I'd love to
show you up close and personal how good of a lawyer I am, fool."
-- Larry, the poor pathetic bastard
"Having private savings accounts comprise a part of social security
is not the same as privatizing social security."
-- Larry Glasser, stammering imbecile
"What do you think a "DNA Warrant" is? There is no such thing."
-- Larry the legal stooge
" [The Jury] might have unanimously found that he probably committed the
crime,
or likely committed them, or possibly committed them - *or* that he was in
fact
innocent."
-- Larry the idiot
"The jury was hung. Whether it was hung 11 for the top count and 1
for a lesser count or 1 for the top count and 11 to acquit is of no legal
relevance in terms of bail."
-- Larry the legal imbecile
" Actually, prisons are one of the few public places where
you can still smoke."
-- Larry the moron
"There are over 1300 ADAs in New York City alone, and
I personally know at least a half-dozen named Larry or Lawrence."
-- Larry the eponymous fool
" I don't know a single attorney, public or private,
who knows his/her attorney registration number."
-- Larry Glasser
"Plus, receiving stolen money (or property of any kind) is only a
crime if the recipient knows it is stolen"
-- Lyin' Larry, the legal jackass
>>>> Kent Wills: "I'm just the guy who can travel without restriction to
>>>> several Latin American countries."
>>>> UM: "Why not all the Latin American countries then, eh Kent?"
>>>> Larry the imbecile Glasser: "Federal law, dumbass. No citizen can go
>>>> to some of the nations from the US."
Larry the Imbecile claims that 0.625 grams is "far more than a gram"
and that a handcuffed man will "fall faster" when pushed off a cliff.
>>>> Q: And just what does a moron like you think a Townhouse is, eh
jackass ?
>>>> Larry the Ignoramus: "A dwelling, which is a type of structure or
building.
>>>> It is not, however, real
property."
"I never mentioned New York? That's so demonstrably false I'm still
laughing. Anytime I speak in anything resembling a specific, I make it
clear that I'm referring to NY statutes. I've never claimed to know the
details of criminal statutes in other jurisdictions."
-- Larry Glasser the Pathological Liar
Q: "So people who suffer from a medical/mental disability don't have
the "right" to defend their homes, eh comrade ?"
Larry the Legal Imbecile: "No, they don't."
|
