Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Blade Runner > Re: The Final C...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 12 Topic 2367 of 2559
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Final Cut question

by Gnomus <gnomus@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 17, 2008 at 11:49 PM

In article <e8mdnV5oZpV4SyXanZ2dnUVZ_oaonZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Alric
Knebel <alric@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Today I watched a bunch of Blade Runner stuff from the 5-disc set.  It 
> was interesting watching how much dedication was put into fixing the 
> goofs.  Now, in the original BR -- both the theatrical release and 
> Director's Cut -- we have that scene when Deckard is questioning the 
> Egyptian and the lips don't sync with the dialogue.  In fact, it looks 
> as if Deckard is having a completely different conversation from what we

> actually hear.  So they go through all this trouble to fix this one 
> goof.  They hire Ford's son and they use his lips, by filming him 
> reciting the actual dialogue.  Visually it syncs beautifully.  But what 
> I didn't get was, in the WORK PRINT, this exchange between Deckard and 
> the Egyptian is just fine.  I mean, the conversation we hear is the one 
> we're seeing.  Granted, the actual dialogue is different from the 
> theatrical release, but for moving the plot along, it really didn't make

> a difference.  Splicing that scene in from the work print would have 
> worked just fine.  What's up with that?

The other thing, if I remember correctly, is the number of "skinjobs"
on the loose is actually consistent and correct.  So they went from
having it right to screwing it all up.

> 
> And about that workprint, today was the first time I'd seen it. 
> Interesting.  Not really a noticeable difference, except for the music 
> and the ending.

There are actually a lot of little details that differ from the other
versions, like when Deckard is looking at Leon's photos in the Esper
and sees Roy, he says "Hello, Roy."  I didn't register them all the
first time I saw it.

> 
> I found the way the deleted scenes were strung together was interesting.

>   I found it incredulous that Ford had actually recorded that much 
> narration, as some of it seemed pointless, even redundant, since what he

> was describing was often very obvious.  But I can see why what was 
> deleted was left out.  That stuff with Holden in the tube didn't feel 
> anything like the rest of the movie.  The whole mood was different. 
> Contrived or something.  So did the scene with Gaff and Brian, when they

> were spying on Deckard's and Holden's conversation.

Yeah, there was a good reason to take that stuff out and leave it out.  

> 
> What a movie.  The do***entary three hours long!  Made me feel special, 
> that I got in on the greatness of this movie so early.
 




 12 Posts in Topic:
The Final Cut question
Alric Knebel <alric@[E  2008-02-17 18:54:53 
Re: The Final Cut question
Gnomus <gnomus@[EMAIL   2008-02-17 23:49:02 
Re: The Final Cut question
"Martin Schemitsch&q  2008-02-22 20:07:02 
Re: The Final Cut question
Gnomus <gnomus@[EMAIL   2008-02-22 15:31:02 
Re: The Final Cut question
"Martin Schemitsch&q  2008-02-23 13:35:37 
Re: The Final Cut question
Alric Knebel <alric@[E  2008-02-23 12:14:42 
Re: The Final Cut question
"Martin Schemitsch&q  2008-02-28 14:40:11 
Re: The Final Cut question
Alric Knebel <alric@[E  2008-02-29 04:24:33 
Re: The Final Cut question
Ned Ludd <andy.block@[  2008-02-29 08:05:53 
Re: The Final Cut question
Gnomus <gnomus@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 14:30:02 
Re: The Final Cut question
Ned Ludd <andy.block@[  2008-02-23 10:09:51 
Re: The Final Cut question
Zinema <zinema@[EMAIL   2008-02-29 19:59:15 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 18:18:31 CDT 2008.