Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Blade Runner > The Final Cut q...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 12 Topic 2367 of 2452
Post > Topic >>

The Final Cut question

by Alric Knebel <alric@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 17, 2008 at 06:54 PM

Today I watched a bunch of Blade Runner stuff from the 5-disc set.  It 
was interesting watching how much dedication was put into fixing the 
goofs.  Now, in the original BR -- both the theatrical release and 
Director's Cut -- we have that scene when Deckard is questioning the 
Egyptian and the lips don't sync with the dialogue.  In fact, it looks 
as if Deckard is having a completely different conversation from what we 
actually hear.  So they go through all this trouble to fix this one 
goof.  They hire Ford's son and they use his lips, by filming him 
reciting the actual dialogue.  Visually it syncs beautifully.  But what 
I didn't get was, in the WORK PRINT, this exchange between Deckard and 
the Egyptian is just fine.  I mean, the conversation we hear is the one 
we're seeing.  Granted, the actual dialogue is different from the 
theatrical release, but for moving the plot along, it really didn't make 
a difference.  Splicing that scene in from the work print would have 
worked just fine.  What's up with that?

And about that workprint, today was the first time I'd seen it. 
Interesting.  Not really a noticeable difference, except for the music 
and the ending.

I found the way the deleted scenes were strung together was interesting. 
  I found it incredulous that Ford had actually recorded that much 
narration, as some of it seemed pointless, even redundant, since what he 
was describing was often very obvious.  But I can see why what was 
deleted was left out.  That stuff with Holden in the tube didn't feel 
anything like the rest of the movie.  The whole mood was different. 
Contrived or something.  So did the scene with Gaff and Brian, when they 
were spying on Deckard's and Holden's conversation.

What a movie.  The documentary three hours long!  Made me feel special, 
that I got in on the greatness of this movie so early.
-- 
_________________
Alric Knebel

http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com




 12 Posts in Topic:
The Final Cut question
Alric Knebel <alric@[E  2008-02-17 18:54:53 
Re: The Final Cut question
Gnomus <gnomus@[EMAIL   2008-02-17 23:49:02 
Re: The Final Cut question
"Martin Schemitsch&q  2008-02-22 20:07:02 
Re: The Final Cut question
Gnomus <gnomus@[EMAIL   2008-02-22 15:31:02 
Re: The Final Cut question
"Martin Schemitsch&q  2008-02-23 13:35:37 
Re: The Final Cut question
Alric Knebel <alric@[E  2008-02-23 12:14:42 
Re: The Final Cut question
"Martin Schemitsch&q  2008-02-28 14:40:11 
Re: The Final Cut question
Alric Knebel <alric@[E  2008-02-29 04:24:33 
Re: The Final Cut question
Ned Ludd <andy.block@[  2008-02-29 08:05:53 
Re: The Final Cut question
Gnomus <gnomus@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 14:30:02 
Re: The Final Cut question
Ned Ludd <andy.block@[  2008-02-23 10:09:51 
Re: The Final Cut question
Zinema <zinema@[EMAIL   2008-02-29 19:59:15 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun May 18 4:45:27 CDT 2008.