Re: Machines 'to match man by 2029'

Sentinel wrote:
>> Also despite lots of articles of this type, we don't seem to be any
>> closer to armies of roaming nanobots in our bodies, and would people
>> honestly be very happy about having armies of nanobots roaming their
>> bodies? Well, aside from some of the nutters on this group ;-)
>
> One man's visionary is another's complete nutter, I suppose. :-)

History bears that out I guess, although I have a feeling that most end up

being nutters.

> Yes, the nano thing is like all things human, it can be a blessing or
> a curse. Like most things human, the latter seems more likely.

I'm trying to think of mainstream books/films/TV where nano robots have 
featured. I remember Mulder was injected with them in the X-Files, if
memory 
serves.

-- 
StainlessSteelRat
http://www.stainlesssteelrat.net

Allegra: Oh God!
Ted: What happened?
Allegra: The whole pod just disappeared into your back.
Ted: It disappeared into my back? It's in my spine? It's working its
way around my spinal cord? Allegra: Don't panic, it's just a game.