fukoff sand nigga
The Dixie ****s wrote:
> Prof. Milton Goldblatt wrote:
> > Key Reagan advisor Hon. Paul Roberts:
> >
> > "Gullible Americans have been duped by the 9/11 Hoax... Wise up -- the
> > world is laughing at you."
> >
> > Who is Paul Craig Roberts?
> > Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under Ronald
> > Reagan (awarded the Treasury Department's Meritorious Service Award
for
> > "his outstanding contributions to the formulation of United States
> > economic policy.")
> > Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University,
> > and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute.
> > Former editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal and columnist
> > for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service
> > Held the William E. Simon Chair in Political Economy at the Center for
> > Strategic and International Studies (1982 -1993)
> > Distinguished Fellow at the Cato Institute from 1993 to 1996
> > Olin Fellow at the Institute for Political Economy
> > Nationally syndicated columnist for Investor's Business Daily
> > Winner of the 1992 Warren Brookes Award for Excellence in Journalism
> > Ranked "One of the top seven journalists" by the Forbes Media Guide
> > (1993)
> > Author of, The Tyranny of Good Intentions, and Marx's Theory of
> > Exchange, Alienation and Crisis
> >
> > Dr. Roberts was educated at the Georgia Institute of Technology (
> > B.S.), the University of Virginia (Ph.D.), the University of
California
> > at Berkeley and Oxford University where he was a member of Merton
> > College.
> >
> > He is listed in Who's Who in America, Who's Who in the World , The
> > Dictionary of International Biography, Outstanding People of the
> > Twentieth Century, and 1000 Leaders of World Influence.
> >
> >
> > Could anyone in their right mind consider this man a crackpot
> > "conspiracy theorist"?
> >
> >
_______________________________________________________________________=
____
> >
> > Gullible Americans
> >
> > By Paul Craig Roberts
> > Information Clearing House
> > 08/14/06
> >
> >
> > I was in China when a July Harris Poll re****ted that 50 percent of
> > Americans still believe that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when
> > Bush invaded that country, and that 64 percent of Americans still
> > believe that Saddam Hussein had strong links with Al Qaeda.
> >
> > The Chinese leaders and intellectuals with whom I was meeting were
> > incredulous. How could a majority of the population in an allegedly
> > free country with an allegedly free press be so totally misinformed?
> >
> > The only answer I could give the Chinese is that Americans would have
> > been the perfect population for Mao and the Gang of Four, because
> > Americans believe anything their government tells them.
> >
> > Americans never check any facts. Who do you know, for example, who
has
> > even read the Re****t of the 9/11 Commission, much less checked the
> > alleged facts re****ted in that document. I can answer for you. You
> > don't know anyone who has read the re****t or checked the facts.
> >
> > The two co-chairmen of the 9/11 Commission Re****t, Thomas Kean and Lee
> > Hamilton, have just released a new book, "Without Precedent: The
Inside
> > Story of the 9/11 Commission." Kean and Hamilton reveal that the
> > commission suppressed the fact that Muslim ire toward the US is due to
> > US sup****t for Israel's persecution and dispossession of the
> > Palestinians, not to our "freedom and democracy" as Bush
> > propagandistically claims. Kean and Hamilton also reveal that the US
> > military committed perjury and lied about its failure to intercept the
> > hijacked airliners. The commission even debated referring the
> > military's lies to the Justice Department for criminal investigation.
> > Why should we assume that these admissions are the only coverups and
> > lies in the 9/11 Commission Re****t?
> >
> > How do you know that 9/11 was a Muslim terrorist plot? How do you
know
> > that THREE World Trade Center buildings collapsed because TWO were hit
> > by airliners? You only "know" because the government gave you the
> > explanation of what you saw on TV. (Did you even know that three WTC
> > buildings collapsed?)
> >
> > I still remember the enlightenment I experienced as a student in
> > Russian Studies when I learned that the Czarist secret police would
set
> > off bombs and then blame those whom they wanted to arrest.
> >
> > When Hitler seized dictatorial power in 1933, he told the Germans that
> > his new powers were made necessary by a communist terrorist attack on
> > the Reichstag. When Hitler started World War II by invading Poland,
he
> > told the Germans that Poland had crossed the frontier and attacked
> > Germany.
> >
> > Governments lie all the time--especially governments staffed by
> > neoconservatives whose intellectual godfather, Leo Strauss, taught
them
> > that it is permissible to deceive the public in order to achieve their
> > agenda.
> >
> > Some readers will write to me to say that they saw a TV documentary or
> > read a magazine article verifying the government's explanation of
9/11.
> > But, of course, these Americans did not check the facts either--and
> > neither did the people who made the documentary and wrote the magazine
> > article.
> >
> > Scientists and engineers, such as Clemson University Professor of
> > Engineering Dr. Judy Woods and BYU Professor of Physics Dr. Steven
> > Jones, have raised compelling questions about the official account of
> > the collapse of the three WTC buildings. The basic problem for the
> > government's account is that the buildings are known to have fallen at
> > freefall speed, a fact that is inconsistent with the government's
> > "pancaking" theory in which debris from above collapsed the floors
> > below. If the buildings actually "pancaked," then each floor below
> > would have offered resistance to the floors above, and the elapsed
time
> > would have been much longer. These experts have also calculated that
> > the buildings did not have sufficient gravitational energy to
> > accommodate the government's theory of the collapse. It is certainly
> > a known and non-controversial fact among physicists and engineers that
> > the only way buildings can collapse at freefall speed into their own
> > footprints is by engineered demolition . Explosives are used to
remove
> > the sup****t of floors below before the debris from above arrives.
> > Otherwise, resistance is encountered and the time required for fall
> > increases. Engineered demolition also explains the symmetrical
> > collapse of the buildings into their own foot prints. As it is
> > otherwise improbable for every point in floors below to weaken
> > uniformly, "pancaking" would result in asymmetrical collapse as some
> > elements of the floor would give sooner than others.
> >
> > Scientific evidence is a tough thing for the American public to
handle,
> > and the government knows it. The government can rely on people
> > dismissing things that they cannot understand as "conspiracy theory."
> > But if you are inclined to try to make up your own mind, you can find
> > Dr. Jones' and Dr. Woods' papers, which have been formally presented
to
> > their peers at scientific meetings, on line at http://www.st911.org/
> >
> > Experts have also pointed out that the buildings' massive steel
> > skeletons comprised a massive heat sink that wicked away the heat from
> > the limited, short-lived fires, thus preventing a heat buildup.
> > Experts also point out that the short-lived, scattered, low-intensity
> > fires could barely reach half the melting point of steel even if they
> > burned all day instead of merely an hour .
> >
> > Don't ask me to tell you what happened on 9/11. All I know is that
the
> > official account of the buildings' collapse is improbable.
> >
> > Now we are being told another improbable tale. Muslim terrorists in
> > London and Pakistan were caught plotting to commit mass murder by
> > smuggling bottles of explosive liquids on board airliners in hand
> > luggage. Baby formula, shampoo and water bottles allegedly contained
> > the tools of suicide bombers.
> >
> > How do we know about this plot? Well, the police learned it from an
> > "Islamic militant arrested near the Afghan-Pakistan border several
> > weeks ago." And how did someone so far away know what British-born
> > people in London were plotting?
> >
> > Do you really believe that Western and Israeli intelligence services,
> > which were too incompetent to prevent the 9/11 attack, can uncover a
> > London plot by capturing a person on the Afghan border in Pakistan?
Why
> > would "an Islamic militant" rat on such a plot even if he knew of it?
> >
> > More probable explanations of the "plot" are readily available.
> > According to the August 11 Wayne Madsen Re****t, informed sources in
the
> > UK re****t that "the Tony Blair government, under siege by a Labor
Party
> > revolt, cleverly cooked up a new 'terror' scare to avert the public's
> > eyes away from Blair's increasing political woes. British law
> > enforcement, neocon and intelligence operatives in the US, Israel, and
> > Britain, and Rupert Murdoch's global media empire cooked up the
> > terrorist plot, liberally borrowing from the failed 1995 'Oplan
Bjinka'
> > plot by Pakistan- and Philippines-based terrorist Ramzi Ahmad Yousef
> > to crash 11 trans-Pacific airliners bound from Asia to the US."
> >
> > There are other plausible explanations. For example, our puppet in
> > Pakistan decided to arrest some people who were a threat to him. With
> > Bush's commitment to "building democracy in the Middle East," our
> > puppet can't arrest his political enemies without cause, so he lays
the
> > blame on a plot.
> >
> > Any testimony against Muslim plotters by "an Islamic militant" is
> > certain to have been bought and paid for.
> >
> > Or consider this explanation. Under the Nuremberg standard, Bush and
> > Blair are war criminals. Bush is so worried that he will be held
> > accountable that he has sent his attorney general to consult with the
> > Republican Congress to work out legislation to protect Bush
> > retroactively from his violations of the Geneva Conventions .
> >
> > Tony Blair is in more danger of finding himself in the dock. Britain
> > is signatory to a treaty that, if justice is done, will place Blair
> > before the International Criminal Court in the Hague.
> >
> > What better justification for the two war criminals' illegal actions
> > than the need to foil dastardly plots by Muslims recruited in sting
> > operations by Western intelligence services? The more Bush and Blair
> > can convince their publics that terrorist danger abounds, the less
> > likely Bush and Blair are ever to be held accountable for their
crimes.
> >
> >
> > But surely, some readers might object, our great moral leaders
wouldn't
> > do something political like that!
> >
> > They most certainly would. As Joshua Micah Marshall wrote in the July
> > 7 issue of Time magazine, the suspicion is "quite reasonable" that
"the
> > Bush Administration orchestrates its terror alerts and arrests to
goose
> > the GOP's poll numbers."
> >
> > Joshua Micah Marshall proves his conclusion by examining the barrage
of
> > color-coded terror alerts, none of which were real, and, yes, it all
> > fits with political needs.
> >
> > And don't forget the plot unearthed in Miami to blow up the Sears
Tower
> > in Chicago. Described by Vice President Cheney as a "very real
threat,"
> > the plot turned out to be nothing more than a few harmless whackos
> > recruited by an FBI agent sent out to organize a sting.
> >
> > There was also the "foiled plot" to blow up the Holland Tunnel and
> > flood downtown New York City with sea water. Thinking New Orleans,
the
> > FBI invented this plot without realizing that New York City is above
> > sea level. Of course, most Americans didn't realize it either.
> >
> > For six years the Bush regime has been able to count on the ignorant
> > and naive American public to believe whatever tale that is told them.
> > American gullibility has yet to fail the Bush regime.
> >
> > The government has an endless number of conspiracy theories, but only
> > people who question the government's conspiracies are derided for
> > "having a conspiracy theory."
> >
> > The implication is even worse if we assume that the explosive bottle
> > plot is genuine. It means that America and Britain by their own
> > aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan, and by enabling Israel's war
crimes
> > in Palestine and Lebanon, have created such hatred that Muslims, who
> > identify with Bush's, Blair's, and Israel's victims, are plotting
> > retaliation.
> >
> > But Bush is prepared. He has taught his untutored public that "they
> > hate us for our freedom and democracy."
> >
> > Gentle reader, wise up. The entire world is laughing at you.
> >
> >
> > Shalom,
> >
> > --- Prof. Leland Milton Goldblatt, Ph.D. =AE **** u sand nigger
> >
> > http://www.prof.faithweb.com
> > http://drgoldblatt.blogspot.com/
> > New Dr. Goldblatt's Message Board: http://www.eboards4all.com/867960/
|
