On Jun 25, 9:07=A0pm, Art Deco <erfc-1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> BradGuth <bradg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >How about a better topic: =A0Selene w/o Earth
>
> >or how about: =A0Earth/Selene binary planets from Sirius
>
> >- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
>
> Or even better: =A0Moon w/o Brad Guthball and moon hoaxers.
Art Deco's and ah's involvement with the Moon concept!:
http://www.djurvall.burken.nu/Harrys_0330/T/048%20-%20Mooning.jpg
>
>
>
>
>
> >Damien Valentine wrote:
> >> On Jun 21, 10:19 am, BradGuth <bradg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > This seems to suggest that our crystal vacuum dry moon is actually
> >> > considerably more saturated with the low density element of sodium
> >> > than Earth...
>
> >> ...Because the mainstream impact formation theory is the correct one,
> >> and light elements like sodium and potassium stayed in orbit longer,
> >> thereby having more chance to accrete into the Moon 4.5 billion years
> >> ago.
>
> >> > ...and otherwise way more so than Mars that has hardly its
> >> > fair share of sodium or much less the remainders of sea-salts which
> >> > should not have eva****ated or otherwise gone away.
>
> >> How do you know Mars has "hardly its fair share"? =A0Compared with
wha=
t?
>
> >> > Instead this interpretation merely represents the mostly likely
> >> > culprit, especially since there?s no apparent human created
> >> > representations of our having that moon as of prior to 12,500 BP...
>
> >> Except there are, but you refuse to acknowledge them. =A0You gladly
> >> claim that some Paleolithic artifacts depict the sun, athough you
> >> haven't actually shown us any of your "many examples worth
> >> interpreting", or told us why you prefer to interpret them as solar
> >> symbols. =A0But when archaeologists claim that other Paleolithic
> >> artifacts depict the moon, you reject their claims without good
> >> reason. =A0(I take it from the newsgroups you've chosen to post to,
th=
at
> >> you haven't actually discussed your hypothesis with an archaeologist,
> >> like I suggested you should? =A0Much less read a textbook or journal
> >> about Paleolithic archaeology?)
>
> >> > In a further stretch of interpretation; =A0Could some of our human
> >> > species and other complex forms of DNA life have successfully
> >> > interstellar migrated via such an icy proto-moon?
>
> >> Oh, let's not go multiplying entities unecessarily. =A0You haven't
mad=
e
> >> a case for your first "interpretation", let alone a second!
>
> --
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> =A0 -- David Tholen
|
