Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Art Bell > Re: PING nelohT...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 65 of 321 Topic 27871 of 28981
Post > Topic >>

Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008

by "The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt" <popesnarky.godofodd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jun 16, 2008 at 09:27 AM

On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:13:11 +0000, Pope Snarky Goodfella of the
undulating cable, JM, CK, POEE, KOTHASK, DSOCPL, EOTHIDIAUTP, GGGHD, HCNB,
MU, BCB, CPFWJ, CPFG, MWFA, CEM did most oddly state:
> Hail Eris! On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:14:35 +0000, Classic "oar pin"
> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" tholed:
>> Pope Snarky Goodfella of the undulating cable, JM, CK, POEE, KOTHASK,
>> DSOCPL, EOTHIDIAUTP, GGGHD, HCNB, MU, BCB, CPFWJ, CPFG, MWFA, CEM
>> writes:
>>> Hail Eris!
>> 
>> Who is "Eris", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>> alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" tholed:
>> 
>> What was allegedly endured while writing, Snarky?
> 
> The sheer, grinding hunger to grab me by the throat and choke the life
out
> of me?
> 
>>>>> Hail Eris!
>> 
>>>> Who is "Eris", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>> alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" tholed:
>> 
>>>> What was allegedly endured while writing, Snarky?
>> 
>>> <Led Zeppelin>
>>> How many more times...</Led Zep> must I answer the question before you
>>> acknowledge that I have, in fact, done so?
>> 
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> 
> Classic denial from Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
".
> 
>>> You are Tholen, and you thole.
>> 
>> What do I allegedly endure, Snarky?  Your writing, perhaps?
> 
> My continued x-poasting to your private newsgroup sandboxes, perhaps?
> 
>>> Ask not for whom the Tholen tholes; he tholes for thee. Don't ask why,
>>> either.
>> 
>> Illogical.
> 
> Hey, I'm doing a bit of free association; bear with me. Heh.
> 
>>> You endure the slings and arrows of outrageous kookologists, Wee
Davie,
>>> until you can post your replies, which are inevitably delivered in the
>>> same monotone as always.
>> 
>> Who is "Wee Davie", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
> BTW, nice dodge of an otherwise perfectly good explanation.
> 
>>> Since practically
>>> all (if not "all") other usenet.kooks tend to react to this sort of
>>> prodding with screeches, howls, and all sorts of flames, I can only
>>> assume you are stoically enduring all the taunts of AUK in your
mission
>>> to prove... whatever it is you're trying to prove.
>> 
>> Beedee beedee beedee.
> 
> Get it right, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Not
> "Classic erroneous presupposition." Twiki is your mentor.
> 
>>>>>>> Hail Eris!
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "Eris", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that
>>>>>> alias.
>> 
>>>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean?
>> 
>>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Snarky.  No surprise
there,
>>>> really.
>> 
>>> I can't possibly answer your question intelligently if you won't be
>>> more specific.
>> 
>> Are you even capable of an intelligent answer, Snarky?
> 
> Certainly I am. Are you capable of an intelligent question anymore,
> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?
> 
>>>>>>> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
>>>>>> using that alias.
>> 
>>>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean?
>> 
>>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Snarky.  No surprise
there,
>>>> really.
>> 
>>> I can't possibly answer your question intelligently if you won't be
>>> more specific.
>> 
>> Are you even capable of an intelligent answer, Snarky?
> 
> Certainly I am. Are you capable of an intelligent question anymore,
> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?
> 
>>>>>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" tholed:
>> 
>>>>>> What was allegedly endured while writing, Snarky?
>> 
>>>>> You endured the sheer frustration of not being able to have me
>>>>> arrested, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
",
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> for the crime of x-poasting into your sandboxes, of course!
>> 
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> 
>>> Classic denial.
>> 
>> What are you denying, Snarky?
> 
> You the right to claim the authority to demand that anyone else besides
> yourself posts on-topic in any newsgroup, I think. Also, I'm denying
that
> I'm posting off-topic -- in alt.usenet.kooks, you are always topical,
like
> all other kooks. What you've been doing for years -- collecting data on
> who posts on-topic in your favourite newsgroups in your famous "digests"
> -- is nothing short of obsessive net.KKKopping, and unworthy of a
> respected scientist and tenured professor. That, more than anything, is
> what makes you a k00k. IOW, WTF are you doing, Tholen? Assume you prove
> your point, one day: So what? Do you think you'll somehow get AUK
> rmgrouped, or something? Even if your point is ever proven, who cares?
> 
>>>>> To wit, comp.os.os2.advocacy
>>>>> and rec.s****t.basketball.college -- if you're familiar with the
>>>>> concept of metaphor, then you understand that I'm not describing
>>>>> those newsgroups as literal "sandboxes", but instead deriding your
>>>>> net.KKKoppery, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
".
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>>> Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>> Art Deco attempted to confuse the issue further by squeaking:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.  Still beating
your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wife, Tholen?
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note:  no response.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.  I see that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ran away from several
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pieces of evidence of your kookery, Deco.  No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surprise there, really.
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does that have to do with college basketball, ah?
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> What does that have to do with college basketball, Deco?
>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!
>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi, Tholen!*
>> 
>>>>>>>> What does that have to do with college basketball, Snarky?
>> 
>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with Art Bell, OS/2 advocacy,
>>>>>>> astronomy, or for that matter, college basketball itself, Classic
>>>>>>> "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?
>> 
>>>>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Snarky.  No surprise
>>>>>> there, really.
>> 
>>>>> Your question had as much to do with college basketball as it did
>>>>> with Art Bell, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
".
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> In a word, nada.
>> 
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> 
>>> More classic denial.
>> 
>> What are you denying, Snarky?
> 
> You the right to claim the authority to demand that anyone else besides
> yourself posts on-topic in any newsgroup, I think. Also, I'm denying
that
> I'm posting off-topic -- in alt.usenet.kooks, you are always topical,
like
> all other kooks. What you've been doing for years -- collecting data on
> who posts on-topic in your favourite newsgroups in your famous "digests"
> -- is nothing short of obsessive net.KKKopping, and unworthy of a
> respected scientist and tenured professor. That, more than anything, is
> what makes you a k00k. IOW, WTF are you doing, Tholen? Assume you prove
> your point, one day: So what? Do you think you'll somehow get AUK
> rmgrouped, or something? Even if your point is ever proven, who cares?
> 
>>>>> Hence, why should anything I might post have something to with
either
>>>>> of them?
>> 
>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Snarky?
>> 
>>> What does your question have to do with Art Bell, OS/2 advocacy,
>>> astronomy, or for that matter, college basketball itself, Classic "oar
>>> pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks, anything to do with you, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
", is very much on-topic, so I really
>>>>> don't need to worry if I'm being sufficiently topical in posts which
>>>>> you can read from other newsgroups.
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
>>>>>>>>> The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
>>>>>>>>> Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change. Most Hated
>>>>>>>>> Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits **** #16
>> 
>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>> 
>>>>>>> No, it's a .sig,
>> 
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> 
>>>>> No, really, it is
>> 
>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> 
>>> Honestly, it's a .sig, however large it may be...
>> 
>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> 
> ROFL!!! On what basis do you deny that my .sigfile is a .sigfile?
Because
> you say so? LMAO!!!! I don't accept your authority as a net.KKKop as it
> is, Wee Davie (tenured professor****p or no), so what in blue hell makes
> you think for one second that I'll accept that my .sig isn't a .sig,
> merely on your say-so?
> 
>>>>> -- it may be against the conventional rules for ..sigfiles in its
>>>>> dimensions, but it's totally within the regulations for ..sigfile
>>>>> dimensions according to teh mighty Empire of MEOW, to the court of
>>>>> which I am Teh Secretary.
>> 
>>>> Further evidence that you live in a fantasy world, Snarky.
>> 
>>> Are you aware that usenet is a world unto itself, Classic "oar pin"
>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"? Of course, your lack of awareness of
>>> this simple fact would go far to explain the attitude you've been
>>> displaying for so many years...
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> Therefore, I have some discretion in the matter. You may now protest
>>>>> with great vigour and passion.
>> 
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> 
>>> Yet more classic denial.
>> 
>> What are you denying, Snarky?
> 
> Your authority to tell me what a .sig is allowed to be, Classic "oar
pin"
> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". However, the denial to which I
referred
> was *yours*, (as it was in the previous cases above) -- I _do_ have some
> discretion in the matter, and you _can't_ tell me that my .sigs are not
> .sigs, just because you don't consider them such. At least, not in
> anything more than your own opinion. Guess what? Your opinion is worth
as
> much as mine, in this medium. You have to earn that respect you're used
to
> receiving IRL aaaaalllllll over again, on usenet. AFAIK, and as far as
> anyone else knows, you are not *really* Professor David J. Tholen,
> respected astronomer. You're just Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
", a renowned usenet k00k and net.KKKop. The same
goes
> for pretty much all celebrities who attempt to post to usenet -- here,
> you're anonymous. You might be who you say, and you might also be one of
> his former students, who just happens to greatly detest Professor Tholen
> for his anal retentiveness. You can't prove it, not beyond any doubt
> whatsoever, and that isn't a glitch, it's a /feature/.
> 
>>>>>>> silly.
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "silly", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean?
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>> Perhaps a tad long, but you can always go cry in your beer about
>>>>>>> that, if you like, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
>>>>>> using that alias.
>> 
>>>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean?
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Or scream at me, or drone, or whatever.
>> 
>>>>>> What does that have to do with college basketball, Snarky?
>> 
>>>>> Your question had as much to do with college basketball as it did
>>>>> with Art Bell, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
".
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> In a word, nada.
>> 
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> 
>>> You live in a world of denial, as you demonstrate yet again.
>> 
>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> 
> I'd say you just proved my point once more, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
".
> 
>>>>> Hence, why should anything I might post have something to with
either
>>>>> of them?
>> 
>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Snarky?
>> 
>>> What does your question have to do with Art Bell, OS/2 advocacy,
>>> astronomy, or for that matter, college basketball itself, Classic "oar
>>> pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks, anything to do with you, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
", is very much on-topic, so I really
>>>>> don't need to worry if I'm being sufficiently topical in posts which
>>>>> you can read from other newsgroups.
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>>>> [*] Ten quatloos says Tholen fails to note the identity of this
>>>>>>>>> poster from the sigfile.
>> 
>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>> 
>>>>>>> Well, dangitall. <pays ten quatloos to the kitty, since no one
took
>>>>>>> the bet> Here, Fluffy.
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "Fluffy", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean?
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>>>> Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer
>>>>>>>>> #4 AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine
>>>>>>>>> Cog #19 Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy
>>>>>>>>> to send me your sekrit messages.
>> 
>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>> 
>>>>>>> Oh, really?
>> 
>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Snarky?
>> 
>>>>> Your question had as much to do with college basketball as it did
>>>>> with Art Bell, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
".
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> In a word, nada.
>> 
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> 
>>> Classic denial.
>> 
>> What are you denying, Snarky?
> 
> I dunno, why are you projecting, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?
> 
>>>>> Hence, why should anything I might post have something to with
either
>>>>> of them?
>> 
>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Snarky?
>> 
>>> What does your question have to do with Art Bell, OS/2 advocacy,
>>> astronomy, or for that matter, college basketball itself, Classic "oar
>>> pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks, anything to do with you, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
", is very much on-topic, so I really
>>>>> don't need to worry if I'm being sufficiently topical in posts which
>>>>> you can read from other newsgroups.
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>> So where do *you* think I should put instructions on how to reply
>>>>>>> to me in email, then, O All-Knowing And Supremely Wise Classic
"oar
>>>>>>> pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
>>>>>> using that alias.
>> 
>>>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean?
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>>>> To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a
>>>>>>>>> dog****er
>> 
>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>> 
>>>>>>> No, it's a verbally abusive description of someone who isn't
>>>>>>> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
", Classic "oar
>>>>>>> pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
".
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
>>>>>> using that alias.
>> 
>>>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean?
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>> I know that must be a mind-boggling concept for you, Classic "oar
>>>>>>> pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
",
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
>>>>>> using that alias.
>> 
>>>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean?
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>> what with you, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
",
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
>>>>>> using that alias.
>> 
>>>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean?
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>> being such a magnet for abuse for the past fifteen years or more,
>> 
>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> 
>>>>> Classic denial of reality.
>> 
>>>> Why do you deny reality, Snarky?
>> 
>>> Classic IKYABWAI.
>> 
>> Suffering from amnesia, Snarky?
> 
> You were denying the reality of being abused on usenet for fifteen
years,
> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" (and yes you are
> "Tholenator" -- you don't get to decide what appellations may be applied
> to you when you behave like someone who thinks they possess a
non-existent
> authority (I'm well aware that there is no "Empire of MEOW", in the
> strictest sense -- are you aware that it was always a joke? Generally a
> deadpan one...)), and now you deny that you were denying anything. You
> should be Dubya's press secretary.
> 
>>> Hi, Pee-Wee!
>> 
>> Non sequitur.
> 
> Look up Pee-Wee Herman on Google -- better yet, on imdb.com. Pee-Wee's
Big
> Adventure, I believe, has the "I know you are, but what am I?" exchange
> between Pee-Wee and his friend/rival.
> 
>>>>>>> but there actually are other k00ks on usenet who receive the
>>>>>>> attentions of AUK.
>> 
>>>>>> What do the kooks who post there have to do with college
basketball,
>>>>>> Snarky?
>> 
>>>>> What does your question have to do with Art Bell, OS/2 advocacy,
>>>>> astronomy, or for that matter, college basketball itself, Classic
>>>>> "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>> Crazy, isn't it?
>> 
>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Snarky?
>> 
>>>>> What does your question have to do with Art Bell, OS/2 advocacy,
>>>>> astronomy, or for that matter, college basketball itself, Classic
>>>>> "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>> One would think that
>>>>>>> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" isn't the most
>>>>>>> im****tant k00k on usenet, or something.
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
>>>>>> using that alias.
>> 
>>>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin"
>>>>> Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean?
>> 
>>>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>>>> All Hail Discordia!
>> 
>>>>>> Who is "Discordia", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup
using
>>>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>>>> FIVE TONS OF FLAX!
>> 
>>>> Non sequitur.
>> 
>>> GIYF. No one else is...
>> 
>> Also non sequitur.
> 
> Learn some usenet acronyms, why don't you?
> 
>>>>> All Hail Discordia!
>> 
>>>> Who is "Discordia", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>> 
>>> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
>>> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
>>> answer your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>>>> REPENT. The End is always near.
>> 
>>>> Non sequitur.
>> 
>>> Yet another post full of droning lames, IKYABWAI, questions answered
>>> with questions, and denials of reality
>> 
>> I'm well aware that you responded with droning lames, IKYABWAI,
>> questions answered with questions, and denials of reality, Snarky. No
>> need to tell me about it.
> 
> Ha. Ha. Very nice extended IKYABWAI, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
", but I did in fact name you by your usenet nick.
The
> fact that you reject it is neither here nor there, since you apparently
> expect to be treated on usenet as you are IRL, which is very far from
> realistic.
> 
>>> from Classic "oar pin" Tholenator "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
".
>> 
>> Who is "Tholenator", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>> All Hail Discordia!
>> 
>> Who is "Discordia", Snarky?  There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
> 
> There are six newsgroups in this x-poast, Classic "oar pin" Tholenator
> "tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
". Which of them do you mean? I can't possibly
answer
> your question intelligently if you won't be more specific.
> 
>>> REPENT. The End is always near.
>> 
>> Non sequitur.
> 
> It's the answer to a question (one which you conveniently snipped out),
in
> the AUK FAQ. Here, I'll bring it back up from the bottom of my .sig:
> 
> 30. I just realized I am a Maroon. How can I improve my standing in the
> eyes of the Internet, my balloon doll, and, most im****tantly, "Bob"?
> 
> REPENT. The End is always near.
> 
> A scientist such as yourself should take note -- IRL, you receive
respect,
> but on usenet, *other scientists* think you're a k00k. How do you think
> you should interpret that?

I, Snarky, do hereby claim * * * SP****! * * * on David J. "Classic 'oar
pin' Tholenator" Tholen!

-- 
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28; Usenet Ruiner #5
Demon Lord of Confusion; Official Chung Demon; Top Asshole #3
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits **** #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"Atheists are people who have no invisible means of sup****t"
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

"I know how you special busboys are.
You're crazy." -- John "special busboy" Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<HMb3k.2413$bh5.2204@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

"Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it 
adversely." 
-- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID:
<V6xNe.27650$XM3.20042@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- ****chMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep ****ning through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
http://www.screedbomb.info/****chie/

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read? 
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419B9HHI2948AJD832@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

   "Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
sup****ted hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astoni****ngly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

   "If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially sup****ting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

"Right you are correct. Someone hooked me. I do believe in building
relation****ps. That is what Christians are required to do. I am amoral.
I am sure you know what that means. So are Scorpios. I am being
'protected' by the Formosa Rule because of my 'mental illness'. I am not
targeting 'teh Mop Jockey'. You are and you are using me as a bait.
Please stop. I have my own fish to reel in. Leave me alone. It is my hope
that I will be able to catch a fish and reel it in for you. Once my
retired bishop thought I was fi****ng for him and he took the bait, alas
it wasn't me and that spelled the demise of our relation****p. Have a
little bit more faith in me. An Eastern Orthodox bishop thought I was
fi****ng for him and willingly, proudly and defiantly took the bait on
public record, and it wasn't even me. Give me a break." -- Atlanta
Olympiada "Erica" Kane yammered in
Message-ID: <ochc3.ag0.17.1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

               "It does to a certain extant physically and theoretically
it holds even into the quantum but there observational confirmation is
limited or non existent. That's the problem and the major stumbling
block to field unification. For Dr. Einstein held out that a physical
based field theory should be sought out and not left to quantum
uncertainty of how the universe primly base works. Man made coordinate
systems are fine without knowing from where or what is the base essence
of what the space as deduced field is composed of, but not totally
satisfactory. Anomalies keep space cropping up and scientists have to
keep adjusting for these unexpected events. It's like a blind man that
has memorized his physical surroundings to a point he feels very
comfortable until that one new or unexpected event pops up and he's lost
and fumbling." -- nightbat, in one of his more lucid moments.
Message-ID: <b27b0$45ed14a7$46e3a646$6618@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

To Whom It May Concern: Att'y Michael James Cranston stalker kook, Esq.,
is a dog****er and Kook of the Month for March 2007
 




 321 Posts in Topic:
WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Friendly Neighborhood Vot  2008-05-11 01:36:42 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-10 20:49:40 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"Respondant" &l  2008-05-10 21:53:12 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"Rhonda Lea Kirk&quo  2008-05-11 06:20:10 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cuj  2008-05-11 02:06:24 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-05-11 08:23:37 
"VideO Madness" (Thanks (Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April
"Colonel Jake"   2008-05-10 22:40:37 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Hollywood=  2008-05-11 00:05:30 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
reverend maxwell snort &l  2008-05-12 19:49:01 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@[EM  2008-05-12 22:09:55 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"Stell" <ste  2008-05-13 19:09:59 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
reverend maxwell snort &l  2008-05-14 19:38:34 
Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"Kadaitcha Man"  2008-05-11 17:31:20 
PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-05-11 08:22:00 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 21:42:11 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-05-11 20:40:03 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 06:28:08 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"Hagar" <hsa  2008-05-12 20:00:26 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 22:05:28 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-05-13 18:32:45 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 01:57:07 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-05-19 22:43:39 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-05-19 22:50:24 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-05-24 09:15:04 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-05-25 21:08:28 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-05-25 20:04:36 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-26 03:07:32 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-05-26 07:20:43 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-05-26 08:58:39 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-26 10:34:46 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-05-27 23:43:56 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-30 04:29:41 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-05-31 08:01:23 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-31 20:42:05 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-05-31 18:32:26 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt   2008-06-03 13:04:16 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-03 19:03:09 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"Pope Snarky Goodfel  2008-06-03 23:31:49 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-03 21:34:33 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-07 07:51:13 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-07 19:49:27 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-07 15:38:09 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-08 04:30:45 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-08 03:58:03 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-08 07:36:27 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-10 19:24:02 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-10 18:40:06 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-10 19:18:13 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-08 04:32:00 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-08 03:59:19 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Synthetic Networked Andro  2008-06-09 07:45:50 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-09 07:58:43 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Synthetic Networked Andro  2008-06-10 10:34:39 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-10 09:29:12 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-10 19:25:35 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-10 18:40:54 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-04 12:33:28 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"Pope Snarky Goodfel  2008-06-05 02:50:36 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-05 10:37:52 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"Pope Snarky Goodfel  2008-06-06 01:01:12 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"Daryl Hunt" &l  2008-06-05 19:28:56 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-07 08:04:31 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-06 12:14:35 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"Pope Snarky Goodfel  2008-06-07 01:13:11 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"The God of Odd Stat  2008-06-16 09:27:31 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-07 08:01:51 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-07 07:55:50 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-07 19:51:34 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-03 21:35:26 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-04 00:57:23 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-04 12:34:09 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-07 08:06:07 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-08 04:32:26 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-08 03:59:55 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-08 07:34:02 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-08 15:26:58 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-08 12:04:11 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-08 22:03:15 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-08 18:46:17 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-09 07:42:57 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-10 19:26:23 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-10 18:41:25 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-10 19:16:08 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-11 13:37:07 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-11 21:01:17 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-15 08:08:54 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-15 08:58:30 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-15 14:37:53 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"The God of Odd Stat  2008-06-16 09:30:51 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-16 06:45:41 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-16 11:39:48 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
The Original Demon Prince  2008-06-16 19:57:12 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-20 07:50:23 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-20 12:20:34 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt   2008-06-21 00:04:50 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-21 08:10:17 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-21 18:36:58 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Cardinal Snarky of the Fa  2008-06-22 04:40:33 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-22 08:57:32 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-22 12:09:15 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Synthetic Networked Andro  2008-06-23 00:42:51 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-22 19:02:09 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-22 21:31:42 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Synthetic Networked Andro  2008-06-24 01:27:58 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-23 20:38:39 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-24 01:33:52 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
The Secretary of HomInter  2008-06-25 08:59:44 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-25 09:14:33 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt   2008-06-25 18:01:10 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-25 20:47:59 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-25 23:39:44 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Teh Secretary to Teh Impe  2008-06-28 00:24:04 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-27 21:16:58 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-28 09:05:06 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
The Secretary of HomInter  2008-07-05 06:17:21 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-07-05 08:01:03 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-07-05 13:51:14 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt   2008-07-07 07:20:30 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-07-07 20:59:59 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-07-07 22:06:13 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"The God of Odd Stat  2008-07-11 13:55:06 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-07-12 12:44:37 
Art Deco wants to PING nelohT:
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-07-12 15:43:21 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-25 23:39:15 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-15 14:37:28 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-11 21:02:44 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Synthetic Networked Andro  2008-06-09 07:47:16 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-10 19:26:53 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-10 18:41:56 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-10 19:17:14 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
The Black Goat With A Tho  2008-06-12 01:52:05 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-11 21:00:12 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Teh Secretary to Teh Impe  2008-06-12 09:22:37 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-12 19:19:32 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"The God of Odd Stat  2008-06-20 03:29:01 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-20 07:51:39 
Art Deco is an Obsessed Ko0k for D. Tholen....report at 6....
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-20 12:21:47 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt   2008-06-21 00:06:01 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-21 08:10:40 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-21 18:37:28 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Cardinal Snarky of the Fa  2008-06-22 04:41:49 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-22 08:57:52 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-22 12:09:53 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
The Original Demon Prince  2008-06-23 00:41:37 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-22 19:01:46 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-22 21:32:26 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Synthetic Networked Andro  2008-06-24 01:28:46 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-23 20:39:05 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-24 01:34:37 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
The Secretary of HomInter  2008-06-25 09:00:41 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-25 09:19:07 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt   2008-06-25 18:00:19 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-25 20:47:37 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-25 23:42:26 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Teh Secretary to Teh Impe  2008-06-28 00:29:26 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-27 21:17:25 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-28 09:05:28 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
The Secretary of HomInter  2008-07-05 06:18:05 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-07-05 08:01:27 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-07-05 13:51:45 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt   2008-07-07 07:21:32 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-07-07 21:00:36 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-07-07 22:10:03 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
"The God of Odd Stat  2008-07-11 13:55:51 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-07-12 12:44:59 
Deco is illiterate....
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-07-12 15:44:22 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-25 23:40:17 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-12 20:26:33 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-11 20:59:45 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-08 04:32:40 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-08 04:01:21 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-08 14:20:30 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-10 19:27:10 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-10 18:43:00 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-07 07:52:59 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-07 19:50:05 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-07 15:39:02 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-08 04:33:17 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-08 04:01:52 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-08 07:34:41 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-08 22:02:14 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-08 18:45:17 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
tholen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-09 07:42:11 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
ah <splifingate@[EMAIL  2008-06-10 19:27:46 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-10 19:14:48 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
The Black Goat With A Tho  2008-06-12 02:14:03 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-11 20:58:49 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Teh Secretary to Teh Impe  2008-06-12 09:24:00 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
Art Deco <erfc-1024@[E  2008-06-12 19:19:57 
Re: PING nelohT: Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, April 2008
<honestjohn@[EMAI