"ah" <splifingate@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> kirjoitti
viestissä:483a9be8$0$223$892e0abb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Art Deco wrote:
>> ah <splifingate@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>> ah <splifingate@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>Froot Bat wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 02:16:58 +0100, Simon <me1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:58:03 +0000, Froot Bat <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 01:50:11 +0100, Simon <me1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:43:10 +0000, Froot Bat <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I just don't count the voices in the heads of Altnet
>>>>>>>>>>>>subscribers
>>>>>>>>>>>>as different people.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>And I suppose you have proof that we're all the same person?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And I suppose I need proof that you're all the same person?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you're gonna claim that we are,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>We?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yes, we. As in, "The nominative plural of "I" used to refer to the
>>>>>>>speaker and one or more other persons."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know what's funnier; that you had to look up the meaning of
>>>>>> "we" or that you put quotes around it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"snicker"? Are you a ten-year-old?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>then yes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I disagree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Disagree as much as you like, stamp your feet if you wish too, you
>>>>>>>have
>>>>>>>offered NO evidence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I'll leave the feet stamping to you, demanding "proof" and
>>>>>> "evidence". I'll just continue to disagree that I have to provide
it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>So, do you have that proof or not?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Do I need that proof or not?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You're making the claim! You provide the evidence!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or else?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Anyway, what's your obsession with people who post from alt.net?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>How do you define "obsession"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>A compulsive, often unreasonable idea or emotion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remarking that you are posting under more than one name is an
>>>>>> obsession? I'd call it an observation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Every post you see in uk.media.tv.misc from an alt.net user
>>>>>>>you claim is from the same person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Every post? You mean you and that other person (you)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>
>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>
>>>> *snicker*
>>>
>>>*snicker*
>>
>> *snicker*
>
> *snicker*
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>(you
>>>>>>>obviously check headers on all posts - another obsession & the sign
>>>>>>>of a
>>>>>>>netcop)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's to check? The headers are there in plain sight. If you're so
>>>>>> upset or paranoid about other people seeing your headers, don't
post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, I've cut the crosspost to five but left in your additions
>>>>>> demon.local and altnet.general, since you obviously think people
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> are interested in your mindless, cry-baby ravings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>*pops popcorn*
>>>>
>>>> <makes guacamole>
>>>
>>>*peels onions*
>>
>> <heats refried beans>
>
> *de-bones chicken*
> --
> ah
|
