"Art Deco" <erfc-1024@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:250520082003373681%erfc-1024@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ah <splifingate@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> ah <splifingate@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>Froot Bat wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 02:16:58 +0100, Simon <me1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:58:03 +0000, Froot Bat <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 01:50:11 +0100, Simon <me1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:43:10 +0000, Froot Bat <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>No, I just don't count the voices in the heads of Altnet
>>>>>>>>>>>subscribers
>>>>>>>>>>>as different people.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And I suppose you have proof that we're all the same person?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>And I suppose I need proof that you're all the same person?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>If you're gonna claim that we are,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>We?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, we. As in, "The nominative plural of "I" used to refer to the
>>>>>>speaker and one or more other persons."
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know what's funnier; that you had to look up the meaning of
>>>>> "we" or that you put quotes around it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"snicker"? Are you a ten-year-old?
>>>>>
>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>then yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I disagree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Disagree as much as you like, stamp your feet if you wish too, you
>>>>>>have
>>>>>>offered NO evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I'll leave the feet stamping to you, demanding "proof" and
>>>>> "evidence". I'll just continue to disagree that I have to provide
it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>So, do you have that proof or not?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Do I need that proof or not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're making the claim! You provide the evidence!
>>>>>
>>>>> Or else?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Anyway, what's your obsession with people who post from alt.net?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>How do you define "obsession"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>A compulsive, often unreasonable idea or emotion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Remarking that you are posting under more than one name is an
>>>>> obsession? I'd call it an observation.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Every post you see in uk.media.tv.misc from an alt.net user
>>>>>>you claim is from the same person.
>>>>>
>>>>> Every post? You mean you and that other person (you)?
>>>>>
>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>
>>>>*snicker*
>>>
>>> *snicker*
>>
>>*snicker*
>
> *snicker*
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>(you
>>>>>>obviously check headers on all posts - another obsession & the sign
of
>>>>>>a
>>>>>>netcop)
>>>>>
>>>>> What's to check? The headers are there in plain sight. If you're so
>>>>> upset or paranoid about other people seeing your headers, don't
post.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, I've cut the crosspost to five but left in your additions
>>>>> demon.local and altnet.general, since you obviously think people
there
>>>>> are interested in your mindless, cry-baby ravings.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>*pops popcorn*
>>>
>>> <makes guacamole>
>>
>>*peels onions*
>
> <looking for Uranus>
When are you NOT looking for "ah's" anus?
HJ
|
