On May 8, 10:24 am, "Hagar" <ha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "chatnoir" <wolfbat3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:1c235728-9f80-4895-b0f8-6ff4fed92f24@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 3, 5:18 pm, Art Deco <e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> oldcoot <oldcoot7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >On May 3, 1:04 pm, Jeff$B"%(BRelf <Jeff_R...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >> Unless and until you can show how your " Plenum "
> >> >> is empirically different from General Relativity, it's useless.
>
> >> Amazing! I agree with Jeff Relf, he is completely correct.
>
> >> >One aspect or 'sidebar' of it, the flowing-space model of gravity,
> >> >explains the causal mechanism behind the *effects* which GR
> >> >describes. Essentially the *same* model has been deduced
independantly
> >> >and without collaboration by a number of people worldwide, some of
> >> >whom have posted on the Web. If interested, Google:
>
> >> >Jerry Shifman, gravity
> >> >Henry Warren, gravity
> >> >Herry Lindner, gravity
> >> >Tom Martin, gravity
> >> >James Huenefeld, gravity
> >> >F. Stefanko, gravity
>
> >> The number of people that subscribe to nonsense has zero relation to
> >> the veracity of the ideas associated with that nonsense.
>
> >> Neonazi revisionist holocaust deniers -- a dime a dozen, and every
one
> >> of them 100% wrong.
>
> >> >Their models differ only superficially, but all see essentially the
> >> >same mechanism : the accelerating, omnidirectional 'reverse
starburst'
> >> >flow of the spatial medium into mass with mass synonymous with flow
> >> >sink (or pressure drain). Per Occam's razor, they see that gravity
> >> >really *is* exactly what it appears to be and behaves as. It's a no
> >> >brainer like "Doh! the Earth really `is` round and revolves around
the
> >> >sun."
> >> > Gordon Wolter's CBB model brings to the table one
>
> >> What table? The coffee table?
>
> >> >thing that the others don't emphasize : the SCO, the
hyperpressurized
> >> >state of the spatial medium which drives the flow into the core of
> >> >every atomic nucleus, yielding unification of gravity and the strong
> >> >nuclear force. Under this model, to view the process of gravitation
is
> >> >to view *quite literally* the reverse of the Big Bang process, the
> >> >Continuous BB.
>
> >> Word salads and hand-drawn sketches do not help you out of the
problem
> >> of how the space goo gets back to where it came from. Also, this
> >> statement indicates that you don't understand what is meant by the
term
> >> "big bang".
>
> > Art Deco's Big Bang!:
>
> >http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/dre0081l.jpg
>
> Gee, a picture of Deco losing his mind ... pffffttt- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
A doctor doing an ear exam on Deco reported: "Your hearing looks OK.
But I'll seeing too much light coming across from your other ear..."
-- NoEinstein --
|
