"Jeff?Relf" <Jeff_Relf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message...
news:Jeff_Relf_2008_May_7__9_59_PN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I see not one cosmologist who claims the 4-D gravitational field is
> a ?o void nothing ?; for, without it ( the 4-D field ), there's:
> no space, no time, no pressure, no nothing.
You don't get out much, do ya, Jeff. Here's one...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Guth#Confirmation
His name is Alan Guth, and he's one of the foremost
particle physicists and cosmologists of our age. He's
also known as "The Father of Inflation Theory". And
as you may have gleaned, his inflation theory is not
required in Wolter's CBB model.
Guth writes of "empty space", "vacuums", "false
vacuums", and so forth. Unfortunately, he is also a
great lover of string theory. Oh well, nobody's
perfect.
This is just one instance, one cosmologist as you
wished for. There are many, many others. Do a
search, and you will see. You will find many varied
beliefs about space and space history out there, but
you will also find that every mainstream story out
there includes ponderable objects that FILL a volume
of space, that are "in space" rather than extensions
of space.
I've searched myself, and i have yet to find anybody
except Albert Einstein himself who wrote about such
bodies being "spatial extensions" and that space is
comprised of a relativistic gravitational field.
happy days and...
starry starry nights!
--
Indelibly yours,
Paine
P.S. Thank YOU for reading!
P.P.S. (shh) Some secret sites...
http://painellsworth.net
http://savethechildren.org
http://eBook-eDen.secretsgolden.com
|
