oldcoot <oldcoot7074@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 6, 5:56 pm, "Painius" <starswirlern...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> ...acceptance of the CBB model would
>> swiftly lead to bridging the abyss between relativity and
>> quantum mechanics, and since this acceptance would
>> most likely be brought about by understanding (it)... i'd say you are
>> correct > that it will be a
>> very long time before science is able to free itself from
>> the quicksand of the VSP.
>>
>It's not even necessary to understand the CBB model. The simple FS
>models of Shifner, Lindner, Warren et al, which have no concept of the
>CBB, are quite sufficient. They recognize one Flow that ends up going
>into the atomic nucleus (e.g., Lindner's 'hadronic flow').
And all of these esteemed scientists have the same problem: where does
the space goo go after it enters these little drains?
>That one
>Flow, at increasing levels of acceleration, manifests first as gravity
>and finally as the strong nuclear force within the atom. Voila`-
More magic -- you need flowing space goo to explain the SNF as well as
gravity, so you just decree that it does by fiat. That certainly saves
a lot of hard work and brain power.
>unification of gravity and the SNF. And conciliation of QM and
>relativity.. both utter impossibilities under the VSP.
Incorrect; quantum gravity is an active research topic. How do you
know that it cannot success? I'll go ahead and assume you understand
what the word "research" means.
>
>And as stated many times, the humble and familiar Casimir effect
>likewise demonstrates relativity-QM unification. The perceived
>"attraction" between the two plates is simultaneously the attenuated
>SNF and the amped-up gravitational force between the two plates. The
>Casimir effect is simply demonstrating the interface zone between
>gravity and the SNF. One pressure-driven Flow into the plates'
>constituent nuclei is literally *pushing* the plates together, not
>"attracting" them.
More physics by fiat -- you have decreed that the Casimir effect is
"gravitational", thus it is so. Unfortunately for you, it was
predicted by quantum mechanics long before it was verified
experimentally. Also unfortunately for you, it is neither
gravitational or nuclear -- it is instead a peculiar result of
quantized EM fields.
>
>Invoking the 'River' analogy again, the Casimir flow starts out slow
>and placid (gravity), gradually accelerating as the channel narrows,
>breaking into rapids before finally plunging over the waterfall (into
>the atomic nucleus). The "rapids" are the 'quantum fluctuations' so
>popular with the QED afficianados.
Wrong -- it is quantum field theory.
> Under the VSP there is no 'River' to flow and no
>possibility whatsoever of QM-relativity conciliation.
And you invocation of the Casimir effect does nothing to support this
preconceived physics-by-fiat notion.
--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen
|
