oldcoot <oldcoot7074@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 7, 6:40 am, "Painius" <starswirlern...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> The main difference between the darkness we see
>> when we peer up at the stars at night and the earth
>> upon which we stand and dwell, is...
>>
>> density.
>>
>Eggzackly. Sub-Planckian-wavelength energy density, fancifully
>expressed as "E=mc^3".
"Fancifully" is not quite the word I would use; considering that the
units are not even close to balancing.
Energy density has units of Watts per unit volume:
Energy density =/= energy
What does mass in this "Sub-Planckian-wavelength energy density"
expression mean?
>
>The earth upon which we stand, and the stars, constitute the very
>*lowest* energy and longest-wavelength state of the spatial medium,
>residing on 'this side' of the Planck line. This sprinkling of Matter,
>in terms of its energy density, is the proverbial, ephemeral and
>transient 'dustbunny' tagging along for the ride.
> Yet the starry firmament testifies to the awesome
>dynamism of space itself, each star an incandescing 'vent point' of
>the hyperpressurized medium venting down to its lowest pressure
>state.
Vent? I thought you claimed stars, black holes, planet, etc. are
"drains".
--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen
|
