oldcoot <oldcoot7074@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 6, 8:52 pm, Jeff$B"%(BRelf <Jeff_R...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> It's mostly the layman that has touble with:
>> invisible / endless / 4-D / unblockable / unponderable fields.
>>
>One advantage held by the unwashed "layman" is to have somehow
>escaped the 'no medium', void-space indoctrination. He/she is freed to
>*think* rationally instead of reciting by rote the quagmire of
>"fields", "exchange particles", "messenger particles", "dark matter/
>dark energy", "eleven dimensions" and an ever-mounting patchwork of
>kludges, "adding epicycles" to make an impossible paradigm "work".
What you call an "impossible paradigm" are mathematical models backed
by experimental verification that are the result of the hard work by
many very intelligent people over many scores of years. Your claim
that they did all this after being "indoctrinated" in an arbitrary mode
of thinking is hollow and falls flat, and implies that people cannot
think for themselves. You are quite wrong, and you refuse to even
consider that you are wrong.
--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen
|
