NoEinstein <noeinstein@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 2, 6:20 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> On May 2, 2:10 pm, o...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On May 2, 7:24 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > > --
>> > > This message is brought to you by Androcles
>> > > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
>>
>> > > "jem" <x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> > >news:5yHSj.179414$nr1.147870@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|NoEinsteinwrote:
>>
>> > > | > On May 1, 1:05 pm, jem <x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > > | > Dear jem: The MMX wrongly ruled out the existence of ether.
But
>> > > | > such
>> > > | > experiment simply lacked a control! By my invalidation of the
MM
>> > > | > apparatus as a velocity detecting device, I’ve reinstated ether
as
>> > > | > the
>> > > | > fundamental energy form in the Universe! But the ether ISN’T a
fixed
>> > > | > “grid” against which events can be measured. Rather it varies
in
>> > > | > density and flow closely matching the massive objects that are
in the
>> > > | > cosmos. Astronomers know that there are huge “Swiss
cheese-like”
>> > > | > voids between the galaxies. Those are the areas from which the
ether
>> > > | > coalesced into the adjacent (but not close) matter. So, the
ether
>> > > | > density in those places is nil. If light required ether as a
>> > > | > “medium”
>> > > | > of travel, light would not be able to travel (as a wave)
through the
>> > > | > voids. But photons will travel perfectly well through either
ether,
>> > > | > or through the voids.
>> > > | >
>> > > | > The observed “wave-like” appearance of the interference
patterns
>> > > | > caused by light passing through closely spaced vertical slits
has the
>> > > | > “ripples” off of the “line of sight” of the light source and
parts of
>> > > | > the ripple pattern of interference. But this is due to the
varying
>> > > | > amount of bending of the rays caused by how close to the slit
sides
>> > > | > the photons come. Because photons are composed of clumps of
ether
>> > > | > units—that I call IOTA (the smallest things in the
Universe)—and
>> > > | > because ether is polar, the greater concentration of ether
inside the
>> > > | > atoms of the sides of the slit act like magnets to deflect the
>> > > | > passing
>> > > | > photons. That is why photons can bend (like waves…). —
NoEinstein —
>> > > |
>> > > | Scientists create theories that describe Nature. Other
scientists, who
>> > > | understand those theories, write coffee-table books that try to
explain
>> > > | the highlights of the theories to the lay public. Certain
members of
>> > > | the lay public read those coffee-table books, get some half-baked
ideas
>> > > | from them, and produce what they naively think are alternative
theories
>> > > | using the only format they've ever seen scientific theories
expressed
>> > > | in
>> > > | - coffee-table books. Then when their self-evaluated "improved"
>> > > | "theories" get ignored or ridiculed, they complain about how
Science
>> > > | suppresses new ideas.
>> > > |
>> > > | Sound familiar? Read more about it here -
>> > > |www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
>>
>> > > A clown who creates his own crackpot theory is no scientist.
>>
>> > > Q. Why did Einstein say
>> > > the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
>> > > the speed of light from B to A is c+v?
>> > > A. Because it is true.
>>
>> > > Q. Why did Einstein say
>> > > the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
>> > > the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
>> > > the time for each journey is the same?
>>
>> > ****ing liar.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Light is a duel force. It is unified EM force.
>>
>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Dear Mitch: The "force" of light is the atomic energy excess that
>caused a train of photons to be emitted from the source. There are no
>wave-like EM actions involved. As I've explained: Light travels
>perfectly well through the Swiss cheese-like voids between the
>galaxies. Since only photons could travel 'without' a uniform ether
>density, then waves and EM actions to trans****t light are ruled out.
>— NoEinstein —
Wow. This one needs to be shared.
--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen
|
