Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Albert Silverman > Re: secondary d...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 711 of 744
Post > Topic >>

Re: secondary dominants (in classic music theory)

by "Matthew Fields" <spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 18, 2005 at 12:14 PM

In article <slrnddmb2m.e8d.slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Albert Silverman  <slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 2005-07-16, \o/ Billy <wju425@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Very brilliant Albert. No wonder nobody like you.
>
>Nobody like me?
>
>How sad. The very least that he can do is stop to read my stuff.
>
>
>Albert Silverman
>(Al is in Wonderland!)
>where nobody like me
>>
>>

Come on, don't be shy, it's not like a striptease. Just
show us your music, Al!


-- 
	    Matthew H. Fields http://www.umich.edu/~fields
                         Music: Splendor in Sound
  To be great, do better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
    Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: secondary dominants (in classic music theory)
"Matthew Fields"  2005-07-18 12:14:14 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat May 17 12:22:58 CDT 2008.