In article <d8t2lm$qnb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Bob Pease <robertjp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"Matthew Fields" <spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:hgjse.2078$II.1393@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <slrndb3fkr.m6p.slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Albert Silverman <slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >On 2005-06-15, Bob Pease <robertjp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I certainly wish to remain ignorant of Al-Blather !!!
>> >
>> >As I said.......
>> >
>> >> I prefer sanity instead, thankew very mucho!!
>> >
>> >You have failed.
>> >
>> >> From what little I know about Alstuff, it is mainly true.
>> >
>> >Mainly=100%
>>
>> You have claimed to make music, but you have not backed up those
>> claims with music. Empirically, then, those claims are false.
>>
>> Most of what you write regards your preferences, which cannot be
>classified
>> as true or false. The rest, so far, has been false.
>>
>> >> The problem is that it's not useful in making music!!
>> >
>> >What you are looking for is a set of rules to tell you, in ABC
fa****on,
>> >how to "make" music.
>> >
>> >And you are absolutely correct (there's a first time for everything!)
in
>> >figuring out that explanation of *musical principles* is *NOT* a set
of
>> >rules for making music.
>> >
>> >For once in your life, you got something right.
>> >
>> >Congratulations.
>> >
>>
>>
>> No, Al, we've all known for a very long time now that almost 100% of
>> what you say has nothing at all to do with music.
>>
>> >
>> >Albert Silverman
>> >(Al is in Wonderland!)
>> >where understanding is irrelevant
>> >and ignorance is very relevant
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Ditto with all solipsy trying to pass as scholar****p.
>> >
>> >You don't know the meaning of the word "scholar****p".
>>
>> We've yet to see you even tackle the undergraduate-level
>> assignment of accounting for every note in Schubert's Erlkoenig.
>
>Alburd just doesn't GET it!!
>Since everything he says is true in AlLand, then that proves it is False
in
>reality.
>
>So if Al says I don't know scholar****p, that proves I do.
>Thankew for the compliment Alice!!
>BTW, why not just FOAD!!
>
>I am going to have to start turning hi stuff over to Sparky, the Music
>Machine, to code into non-music,,,
>OOps, Sparky needs a challenge, instead!!
>
>We could start an new Epiminides Parodox...
>
>"In Albert land, everything everyone says is false. You are at the fork
of
>the Yellow brick road..
>Devise a question to..,,"
>..
>RJ P
>
>Mad Hatter
It's been years since i did this, but i think the problem required
both truthtellers and liars, where you couldn't tell which was which,
and the solution was to ask, "which branch of this fork would a liar
tell me is washed out?" and then take whichever branch is the answer.
--
Matthew H. Fields http://www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
|
