In article <slrndb3fkr.m6p.slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Albert Silverman <slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 2005-06-15, Bob Pease <robertjp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I certainly wish to remain ignorant of Al-Blather !!!
>
>As I said.......
>
>> I prefer sanity instead, thankew very mucho!!
>
>You have failed.
>
>> From what little I know about Alstuff, it is mainly true.
>
>Mainly=100%
You have claimed to make music, but you have not backed up those
claims with music. Empirically, then, those claims are false.
Most of what you write regards your preferences, which cannot be
classified
as true or false. The rest, so far, has been false.
>> The problem is that it's not useful in making music!!
>
>What you are looking for is a set of rules to tell you, in ABC fa****on,
>how to "make" music.
>
>And you are absolutely correct (there's a first time for everything!) in
>figuring out that explanation of *musical principles* is *NOT* a set of
>rules for making music.
>
>For once in your life, you got something right.
>
>Congratulations.
>
No, Al, we've all known for a very long time now that almost 100% of
what you say has nothing at all to do with music.
>
>Albert Silverman
>(Al is in Wonderland!)
>where understanding is irrelevant
>and ignorance is very relevant
>
>>
>> Ditto with all solipsy trying to pass as scholar****p.
>
>You don't know the meaning of the word "scholar****p".
We've yet to see you even tackle the undergraduate-level
assignment of accounting for every note in Schubert's Erlkoenig.
>>
>>
>> BOb Pease
>>
>>
--
Matthew H. Fields http://www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
|
