In article <slrndasp9t.n79.slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Albert Silverman <slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 2005-06-13, Bob Pease <robertjp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>><michaelwcho@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:1118686625.696403.176110@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Well, anyways, it sounds to me like Albert Silverman has a lot of
>>> knowledge about music and has given a lot of thought to his system.
>>> Maybe someday it will help bring a little order to how everything is
>>> organized. I am interested, Albert, what kind of music do you play?
>>> Or are you more of a theorist and look at it more as another form of
>>> mathematics?
>>
>> you are either a newbie or an Al sockpuppet.
>>
>> He has a high school extra credit course knowledge of music.
>> He will not admit to playing any music whatever, nor of writing or
arranging
>> anything.
>>
>> He has a Banal theory about chords and intervals, and constantly raves
about
>> anyone who disagrees with him as being brainwashed by Ancient
Establishment
>> dupes.
>>
>> If you are a student of a classic netkook, Al Land is the palce for
you.
>> If you are interested in music, look elsewhere.
>>
>> Bob Pease
>>
>I respect your wish to remain ignorant. I couldn't prevent it if I wanted
>to.
>
>Don't let your music, whatever that may be, interfere with your
ignorance.
>
>
>
>Albert Silverman
>(Al is in Wonderland!)
>where understanding is irrelevant
>and the ignorance of residents is very relevant
But Al, we're not in the position to extend the same courtesy to you.
This is rec.music.theory, and while you have a manifested wish to
avoid music while blathering here, the very nature of this newsgroup
is that we cannot be forced to respect you for it.
--
Matthew H. Fields http://www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
|
