In article <slrndapoq2.8ho.slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Albert Silverman <slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 2005-06-12, Andre Schnoor <andre.schnoor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>
>> Thank you all for your helpful explanations, David, Tom, Bob et Al.
>
>You're welcome!
>>
>> Well, I still have to make some creative choice which spelling to use
in
>> case the actual score does not exist (argh!), which applies to the
Harmony
>> Palettes I am working with. These are a resource for testing different
>> progressions or modulations within a composition.
>>
>> I've got plenty of scales stacked together, used to build chords upon,
>> dynmically chosing vertical scales depending on the progression context
of
>> the moment, ... etc. In such an environment it might perhaps be
suitable to
>> use a more "theoretic" spelling.
>
>No it wouldn't.
>
> However, I'm currently spelling each scale
>> the way it is spelled in isolation, which reads quite fine. Perhaps I
should
>> keep it this way.
>
>Perhaps you should. No, remove the "perhaps".
>
>>
>> Thanks again,
>
>You're welcome!
>
>
>Albert Silverman
>(Al is in Wonderland!)
>where relevance is irrelevant
>and residents don't know how to spell
>
>>
>> Andre
>>
>>
Never lose a chance to flaunt your megalomania, eh, Al?
--
Matthew H. Fields http://www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
|
