In article <slrndan5h3.24t.slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Albert Silverman <slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 2005-06-11, Steve Latham <llatham@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Yes, but sometimes I recklessly use the term classical to describe any
"art"
>> music (as do many people).
>
>This allows you to have it *both* ways, doesn't it?
>
>
>Albert Silverman
>(Al is in Wonderland!)
>where multiplicity of meaning is relevant
>and understanding is irrelevant
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> "¤ Alias" <.@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:efema1d0i8tu7jvavct81g0k585cdkg53q@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:05:57 GMT, "Steve Latham" <llatham@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll play these on the piano later and see what they sound like -
they
>>>>> probably all crop up here and there, I guess.\
>>>>
>>>>I find them in a lot or classical period piano music.
>>>
>>> Hi Steve,
>>> I just want to check whether or not we are on the same page:
>>>
>>> I define 'Classical' as Haydn, Beethoven, and Mozart;
>>>
>>>
>>> Bach,Handel etc are baroque - Schubert, Chopin etc are Romantic.
>>> Do you agree?
>>>
>>> ¤ Alias
>>> (BTW, Thanks for previousPost - very helpful)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Indeed, Al, many of us speak English, in which some words, like
Polyphony, classical, and engineer, have more than one meaning.
--
Matthew H. Fields http://www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
|
