In article <slrnd9sme5.ng.slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Albert Silverman <slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 2005-05-31, Joey Goldstein <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> David Schramm wrote:
>>>
>>> F#-C#-D-G-B-F#. Is this a F#11 chord?
>>
>> That's not any "normal" chord that can be named in any "normal" way.
>> Gmaj7#11/F# makes as much sense as any thing else you'll come up with
probably.
>>
>>> B-D-F#-A#-C#-D-F#-B. Is this a B-Ma9?
>>
>> Better to write it Bm(maj9) or Bm(maj7)(9)
>>
>> Usually, with the root on top of a Bm chord, the maj 7th would not be
>> used, but if that's the sound you want to hear then go for it.
>>
>> But try this too: B-D-F#-G#-C#-D-F#-B
>>
>When you are in Wonderland, anything makes sense!
>
>
>
>Albert Silverman
>(Al is in Wonderland!)
>where nonsense is relevant
>and commonsense is irrelevant
--
Matthew H. Fields http://www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
