In article <slrnd7rdtk.dk1.slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Albert Silverman <slvrmn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 2005-05-08, xeno <xeno@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 7 May 2005, Albert Silverman wrote:
>>
>>> What do *you* believe is most im****tant, assuming that the goal is to
>>> inform those very few in this Wonderful(!) forum who are seriously
>>> interested in understanding chord-based musical principles?
>>
>> That all vivable theory is a reflection of practice & only through
>> practice will systems of harmony or any similar musical what-have-you
will
>> be realizable.
>
>This is *NOT* what I wrote, as it said in the header.
>
>You edited what I wrote and then claimed that this is what I wrote. What
>you left and posted here is only a PART of what I wrote.
>
>So don't answer a question that is not addressed to you unless you
include
>the *ENTIRE* question.
No. And you can't make us. You are posting off-topic for rec.music.theory.
Music is discussed here. I suggest you try music.
>
>
>Albert Silverman
>(Al is in Wonderland!)
>where residents do creative editing
>and "answer" questions which are directed to others
>
As I said, Al, here you are trying to netcop the newsgroup
into your own personal bullying session. Meanwhile, there's some
very interesting discussions of music theory going on here.
If you'd just shut up for a while and try listening to and
making some actual music, you might begin to fathom what they're about.
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such
thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
|
