On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:20:59 -0500, Blue <blue@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 11 Nov 2007 17:40:34 GMT, Sammy Sells <powder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>rruster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
("Reb" Ruster) wrote in
>>news:r4Kdncm4yrBkFKjanZ2dnUVZ_tWtnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>
>>> Luto. Batch 1.
>>>
>>
>>Look it's the troll posting stuff stolen from j****, exactly as he slams
>>jimmy for. Imagine that...
>>Goodie 2 shoes "reb" is worse than jimmy ever thought of being, because
he
>>admits they are reposts for those that can not get them in another
group.
Yes, they are repost's, I never said I would not repost, but with one
major difference. They are not password protected and designed to be
distributed to a few close friends. One similarity is that I am
reposting them for people with low retention news services and those
who cannot access the original news groups they are posted in. Also, I
post the originals in their entirety, not chopped up nor renamed. As
for stolen, the videos are not new by any measure and have been
floating about the groups for quite a while. They are simply more
plentiful in groups I get them from.There are also unique newsgroups
that are not widely known and with original and restricted content,
and will remain that way. Now, anything else to nitpick about?
|
